Jurisdiction and Power: Habeas Corpus and the Federal Court
David Clark
Abstract
Open-access reader
David Clark
Abstract
Open-access reader
This paper criticises the distinction made in Ruddock v Vadarlis that the Federal Court may not issue a writ of habeas corpus, though it may issue an order in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus. The paper argues that the Federal Court may issue a writ of habeas corpus and identifies three statutory bases for this conclusion. The paper also argues that the court in Ruddock v Vardarlis misunderstood the writ in assuming that it was less flexible than it actually is; and that the conclusion reached in that case was unnecessary given the findings actually made by the court.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper criticises the distinction made in Ruddock v Vadarlis that the Federal Court may not issue a writ of habeas corpus, though it may issue an order in the nature of a writ of habeas corpus. The paper argues that the Federal Court may issue a writ of habeas corpus and identifies three statutory bases for this conclusion. The paper also argues that the court in Ruddock v Vardarlis misunderstood the writ in assuming that it was less flexible than it actually is; and that the conclusion reached in that case was unnecessary given the findings actually made by the court.
Key concepts: Habeas corpus, Writ, Law, Jurisdiction, Federal court, Political science, Federal jurisdiction, Statutory law