Phenotypic stability for grain yield in rice
Narayan Bhakta, Shimul Das
Abstract
Narayan Bhakta, Shimul Das
Abstract
Twenty six rice genotypes were evaluated at the Rice Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, over eight environments during wet season 2000 and dry season 2001 for the assessment of yield and yield stability. Pooled analysis of variance for grain yield over environments showed highly significant differences among genotypes, environments and genotype-environment (GxE) interaction indicating diverse and variable nature of cropping environments. The genotypes were classified into four adaptive groups based on regression co-efficient (b) and deviation from regression (S2 d). Majority of the high yielding genotypes in both mid-early group (Daya, Lalat, Sebati, Konark and ORS 199-5) and medium maturity group (Bhuban, Birupa, Meher, Kharavela and Tapaswini) with high yield potential have either above average (b>1) or below average (b1) responses. The genotypes Sarathi and IR 36 with low yield potential exhibited average stability with unit regression and S2 d values not significantly different from zero.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Twenty six rice genotypes were evaluated at the Rice Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture & Technology, Bhubaneswar, over eight environments during wet season 2000 and dry season 2001 for the assessment of yield and yield stability. Pooled analysis of variance for grain yield over environments showed highly significant differences among genotypes, environments and genotype-environment (GxE) interaction indicating diverse and variable nature of cropping environments. The genotypes were classified into four adaptive groups based on regression co-efficient (b) and deviation from regression (S2 d). Majority of the high yielding genotypes in both mid-early group (Daya, Lalat, Sebati, Konark and ORS 199-5) and medium maturity group (Bhuban, Birupa, Meher, Kharavela and Tapaswini) with high yield potential have either above average (b>1) or below average (b1) responses. The genotypes Sarathi and IR 36 with low yield potential exhibited average stability with unit regression and S2 d values not significantly different from zero.
Key concepts: Yield (engineering), Grain yield, Gene–environment interaction, Genotype, Biology, Linear regression, Cropping, Agronomy