Understanding community patterns in large attributed social networks
Rajesh R. Sharma, Matteo Magnani, Danilo Montesi
Abstract
Rajesh R. Sharma, Matteo Magnani, Danilo Montesi
Abstract
There is an inherent presence of communities in online social networks. These communities can be defined based on i) link structure or ii) the attributes of individuals. Attributes can indicate as interests in specific topics, like science-fiction books or romantic movies, or more in general their explicit affiliation to a group inside the network. In this paper, we analyze community structures as defined by how people are associated to third concepts like attributes. To understand the community patterns we analyze three large and one small social network datasets. Our analysis shows that, irrespective of the number of nodes for any particular interest in the network, at least 50% of the nodes are part of the same connected component in the graph induced by each interest. Another interesting result of our analysis is that the majority of sub-communities (50% or above) for any interest are separated by small hops (two to three) from each other.
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
There is an inherent presence of communities in online social networks. These communities can be defined based on i) link structure or ii) the attributes of individuals. Attributes can indicate as interests in specific topics, like science-fiction books or romantic movies, or more in general their explicit affiliation to a group inside the network. In this paper, we analyze community structures as defined by how people are associated to third concepts like attributes. To understand the community patterns we analyze three large and one small social network datasets. Our analysis shows that, irrespective of the number of nodes for any particular interest in the network, at least 50% of the nodes are part of the same connected component in the graph induced by each interest. Another interesting result of our analysis is that the majority of sub-communities (50% or above) for any interest are separated by small hops (two to three) from each other.
Key concepts: Computer science, Community structure, Graph, Social network (sociolinguistics), Connected component, Social network analysis, Data science, Theoretical computer science