Shelley Criticism from Deconstruction to the Present
Arthur Bradley
Abstract
Arthur Bradley
Abstract
This chapter examines criticisms of Shelley from Deconstruction to the present, discussing how New Historicism forever changed Shelley criticism in the 1980s. It argues that the contemporary state of literary criticism remains ‘Shelleyan’. While there seems to be no bigger cliché about Shelley than to claim that he is the ‘poet of mutability’, this philosophy of becoming remains one of the most complex aspects of his thought.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This chapter examines criticisms of Shelley from Deconstruction to the present, discussing how New Historicism forever changed Shelley criticism in the 1980s. It argues that the contemporary state of literary criticism remains ‘Shelleyan’. While there seems to be no bigger cliché about Shelley than to claim that he is the ‘poet of mutability’, this philosophy of becoming remains one of the most complex aspects of his thought.
Key concepts: Deconstruction (building), Criticism, Historicism, New Criticism, Philosophy, Literary criticism, New Historicism, Sociological criticism