1998•Radiation Protection DosimetryRequires access

Influence of Background Exposure on TLD Minimum Dose Detection and Determination Limits

Claudio Traino, Franco A Perrone, C.L. Luperini, Luigi Tana, Massimo Lazzeri, Francesco d’Errico

Open publisher page 11 citations

Abstract

Thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD) are widely used to monitor personal doses due to photon fields in the radiation protection of workers. For these low dose range applications it is essential to decide whether a single TLD retains an occupational air kerma value above background or not. In other words, it is important to determine the detection limit LD and the determination limit LQ of the whole dosimetric system. LD is the smallest value of air kerma that can be detected at a specified confidence level, LQ is the minimum value of air kerma that can be measured with a given precision. ICRP 60 recommends an annual dose limit of 1 mSv for the public. Thus it is possible to take this value as the limit between public and exposed workers, as recommended by the European Community Directive and corresponding local laws. Therefore if NLD(t), the annual detection limit of the TLD system, is considerably less than 1 mSv, TLD evaluation can also be used to decide whether a worker can be considered exposed or not. N is the number of annual TLD readings, LD is the detection limit of the TLD system. Both N and LD depend on the monitoring interval time t. The dependence of LD and LQ on the background radiation level and on the monitoring intervals, i.e. on N, is investigated. Assuming that the background air kerma level is approximately constant, it can be shown that the shorter the time of exposure, the higher the annual detection limit. Furthermore, if one considers an annual dose limit of 1 mSv, LD is seen to be greater than the recording level Lr for short exposure times and the system is not able to evaluate it. A set of 15 TLD-100(LiF: Mg, Ti) dosimetric cards and a Harshaw 6000 TLD automatic card reader have been used in order to determine LD and LQ. It has been found that an increase of the monitoring time t from 30 to 180 days leads to a reduction of the annual detection limit from 0.32 ± 0.10 mGy to 0.100 ± 0.030 mGy. For t <180 days the recording level Lr is less than LD; for t <45 days the investigation level Li is less than LD.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD) are widely used to monitor personal doses due to photon fields in the radiation protection of workers. For these low dose range applications it is essential to decide whether a single TLD retains an occupational air kerma value above background or not. In other words, it is important to determine the detection limit LD and the determination limit LQ of the whole dosimetric system. LD is the smallest value of air kerma that can be detected at a specified confidence level, LQ is the minimum value of air kerma that can be measured with a given precision. ICRP 60 recommends an annual dose limit of 1 mSv for the public. Thus it is possible to take this value as the limit between public and exposed workers, as recommended by the European Community Directive and corresponding local laws. Therefore if NLD(t), the annual detection limit of the TLD system, is considerably less than 1 mSv, TLD evaluation can also be used to decide whether a worker can be considered exposed or not. N is the number of annual TLD readings, LD is the detection limit of the TLD system. Both N and LD depend on the monitoring interval time t. The dependence of LD and LQ on the background radiation level and on the monitoring intervals, i.e. on N, is investigated. Assuming that the background air kerma level is approximately constant, it can be shown that the shorter the time of exposure, the higher the annual detection limit. Furthermore, if one considers an annual dose limit of 1 mSv, LD is seen to be greater than the recording level Lr for short exposure times and the system is not able to evaluate it. A set of 15 TLD-100(LiF: Mg, Ti) dosimetric cards and a Harshaw 6000 TLD automatic card reader have been used in order to determine LD and LQ. It has been found that an increase of the monitoring time t from 30 to 180 days leads to a reduction of the annual detection limit from 0.32 ± 0.10 mGy to 0.100 ± 0.030 mGy. For t <180 days the recording level Lr is less than LD; for t <45 days the investigation level Li is less than LD.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 11 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Thermoluminescence dosemeters (TLD) are widely used to monitor personal doses due to photon fields in the radiation protection of workers. For these low dose range applications it is essential to decide whether a single TLD retains an occupational air kerma value above background or not. In other words, it is important to determine the detection limit LD and the determination limit LQ of the whole dosimetric system. LD is the smallest value of air kerma that can be detected at a specified confidence level, LQ is the minimum value of air kerma that can be measured with a given precision. ICRP 60 recommends an annual dose limit of 1 mSv for the public. Thus it is possible to take this value as the limit between public and exposed workers, as recommended by the European Community Directive and corresponding local laws. Therefore if NLD(t), the annual detection limit of the TLD system, is considerably less than 1 mSv, TLD evaluation can also be used to decide whether a worker can be considered exposed or not. N is the number of annual TLD readings, LD is the detection limit of the TLD system. Both N and LD depend on the monitoring interval time t. The dependence of LD and LQ on the background radiation level and on the monitoring intervals, i.e. on N, is investigated. Assuming that the background air kerma level is approximately constant, it can be shown that the shorter the time of exposure, the higher the annual detection limit. Furthermore, if one considers an annual dose limit of 1 mSv, LD is seen to be greater than the recording level Lr for short exposure times and the system is not able to evaluate it. A set of 15 TLD-100(LiF: Mg, Ti) dosimetric cards and a Harshaw 6000 TLD automatic card reader have been used in order to determine LD and LQ. It has been found that an increase of the monitoring time t from 30 to 180 days leads to a reduction of the annual detection limit from 0.32 ± 0.10 mGy to 0.100 ± 0.030 mGy. For t <180 days the recording level Lr is less than LD; for t <45 days the investigation level Li is less than LD.

Key concepts: Kerma, Thermoluminescent dosimeter, Threshold limit value, Detection limit, Occupational exposure limit, Confidence interval, Radiation protection, Limit (mathematics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of Background Exposure on TLD Minimum Dose Detection and Determination Limits — Research Paper | ScholarLens