2016•Soil ResearchRequires access

Knowledge-based soil type classification using terrain segmentation

Andrei Dornik, Lucian Drăguţ, Petru Urdea

Open publisher page 9 citations

Abstract

Soil information covering regional, continental, or even global scales is needed for modelling, prediction, or estimation of environmental risks, crop yield estimation, carbon stock estimation, or research on climate change. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which geographic object-based image analysis and expert-knowledge, using digital maps of climate, topography, vegetation, and geology as soil covariates (GEOBIA approach), might model and reproduce a conventional soil map at a scale 1 : 1 000 000 in the south-west of Romania. The environmental variables were segmented with a region-growing algorithm, the resulting objects being subsequently classified into soil types using expert-knowledge fuzzy classification rules. To assess the geographical support of classification for the modelling of a conventional soil map, we quantitatively evaluated a pixel-based soil map produced using the same expert-knowledge classification rules, as an alternative to an object-based approach. To evaluate the source of soil information, we quantitatively assessed the map of the World Reference Base soil groups produced by the data-driven global soil information system, SoilGrids, as an alternative to expert-knowledge rules. The digital soil maps were quantitatively compared with the conventional soil map. Evidence was provided that the similarity of soil types with the conventional soil map was higher when the modelling was conducted through GEOBIA approach (general similarity of 65% and fuzzy kappa index of 0.58) than the pixel-based approach and SoilGrids. Furthermore, the results showed that the SoilGrids map achieved higher similarity to conventional soil map than the pixel-based soil map. When tested in another area, without modification to the knowledge-based methodologies, the same conclusions could be drawn, although the two maps recorded lower similarity values. The overall reduction in similarity values is explained by a high variability of some soil types under different environmental conditions.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Soil information covering regional, continental, or even global scales is needed for modelling, prediction, or estimation of environmental risks, crop yield estimation, carbon stock estimation, or research on climate change. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which geographic object-based image analysis and expert-knowledge, using digital maps of climate, topography, vegetation, and geology as soil covariates (GEOBIA approach), might model and reproduce a conventional soil map at a scale 1 : 1 000 000 in the south-west of Romania. The environmental variables were segmented with a region-growing algorithm, the resulting objects being subsequently classified into soil types using expert-knowledge fuzzy classification rules. To assess the geographical support of classification for the modelling of a conventional soil map, we quantitatively evaluated a pixel-based soil map produced using the same expert-knowledge classification rules, as an alternative to an object-based approach. To evaluate the source of soil information, we quantitatively assessed the map of the World Reference Base soil groups produced by the data-driven global soil information system, SoilGrids, as an alternative to expert-knowledge rules. The digital soil maps were quantitatively compared with the conventional soil map. Evidence was provided that the similarity of soil types with the conventional soil map was higher when the modelling was conducted through GEOBIA approach (general similarity of 65% and fuzzy kappa index of 0.58) than the pixel-based approach and SoilGrids. Furthermore, the results showed that the SoilGrids map achieved higher similarity to conventional soil map than the pixel-based soil map. When tested in another area, without modification to the knowledge-based methodologies, the same conclusions could be drawn, although the two maps recorded lower similarity values. The overall reduction in similarity values is explained by a high variability of some soil types under different environmental conditions.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 9 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Soil information covering regional, continental, or even global scales is needed for modelling, prediction, or estimation of environmental risks, crop yield estimation, carbon stock estimation, or research on climate change. This study aims to evaluate the extent to which geographic object-based image analysis and expert-knowledge, using digital maps of climate, topography, vegetation, and geology as soil covariates (GEOBIA approach), might model and reproduce a conventional soil map at a scale 1 : 1 000 000 in the south-west of Romania. The environmental variables were segmented with a region-growing algorithm, the resulting objects being subsequently classified into soil types using expert-knowledge fuzzy classification rules. To assess the geographical support of classification for the modelling of a conventional soil map, we quantitatively evaluated a pixel-based soil map produced using the same expert-knowledge classification rules, as an alternative to an object-based approach. To evaluate the source of soil information, we quantitatively assessed the map of the World Reference Base soil groups produced by the data-driven global soil information system, SoilGrids, as an alternative to expert-knowledge rules. The digital soil maps were quantitatively compared with the conventional soil map. Evidence was provided that the similarity of soil types with the conventional soil map was higher when the modelling was conducted through GEOBIA approach (general similarity of 65% and fuzzy kappa index of 0.58) than the pixel-based approach and SoilGrids. Furthermore, the results showed that the SoilGrids map achieved higher similarity to conventional soil map than the pixel-based soil map. When tested in another area, without modification to the knowledge-based methodologies, the same conclusions could be drawn, although the two maps recorded lower similarity values. The overall reduction in similarity values is explained by a high variability of some soil types under different environmental conditions.

Key concepts: Soil map, Digital soil mapping, Soil survey, Unified Soil Classification System, Soil classification, Soil type, Environmental science, Knowledge base

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Knowledge-based soil type classification using terrain segmentation — Research Paper | ScholarLens