Factors associated with family planning and vasectomy discussions: results from a health provider survey.
Ezekiel E. Young, Brian T. Nguyen, Nomi S. Weiss‐Laxer, Mark Sigman, Patricia A. Nolan
Abstract
Ezekiel E. Young, Brian T. Nguyen, Nomi S. Weiss‐Laxer, Mark Sigman, Patricia A. Nolan
Abstract
This article discusses how the choice of male sterilization through vasectomy which is far less expensive less invasive and safer than female sterilization through tubal ligation is completely underutilized in the United States. It describes a study regarding family planning and gender and the findings suggest that men are being left out of family planning discussions and there are provider-sided factors related to FP and vasectomy.
OpenAlex reports 7 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This article discusses how the choice of male sterilization through vasectomy which is far less expensive less invasive and safer than female sterilization through tubal ligation is completely underutilized in the United States. It describes a study regarding family planning and gender and the findings suggest that men are being left out of family planning discussions and there are provider-sided factors related to FP and vasectomy.
Key concepts: Vasectomy, Family planning, Sterilization (economics), Medicine, Tubal ligation, SAFER, Health services, Family medicine