2015Journal of Apicultural ResearchRequires access

Brood removal influences fall of Varroa destructor in honey bee colonies

Lilia I. de Guzman, Thomas E. Rinderer, Amanda M. Frake, Maria J. Kirrane

Open publisher page 16 citations

Abstract

The hygienic removal of Apis mellifera brood infested with Varroa destructor disrupts the reproduction of the infesting mites, and exposes the foundress mites to potential removal from the colony by grooming. Using brood deliberately infested with marked mites, we investigated the association between the removal of mite-infested brood and the removal of exposed foundress mites in Italian (IHB) and Russian honey bee (RHB) colonies. Our results showed that RHB colonies removed more mite-infested brood in significantly less time (average = 87.9 ± 2.0% for 2.6 ± 0.1 days) than IHB colonies (average = 61.9 ± 7.3% for 3.2 ± 0.1 days or 19.3% per day). For the inoculated brood that was not removed, RHB colonies had lower proportions of brood cells containing: (a) live marked mites regardless of reproductive status (RHB = 4.4 ± 1.3%; IHB = 17.7 ± 5.9%); (b) dead marked mites (RHB = 1.1 ± 0.5%; IHB = 7.1 ± 2.2%); (c) lost introduced marked mites (RHB = 6.6 ± 1.6%; IHB = 13.3 ± 2.8%); and (d) reproductive marked mites (RHB = 8.3 ± 6.3%; IHB = 23.8 ± 6.9%) than IHB colonies did. These observations suggest that RHB colonies indiscriminately remove mite-infested brood regardless of mite status. Regarding trapped mites (i.e., those found below a modified queen excluder), the number of mite-infested brood cells removed positively correlated with the number of mites that were trapped in both honey bee stocks. The majority of the trapped mites fell during the first three days post mite inoculation, which coincided with the highest rates of brood removal. The highest proportions of trapped gravid foundress mites were also recorded during this time, when host bees were early in their development. The comparatively strong and rapid hygienic response of RHB to mite-infested brood and the associated removal of infesting foundresses are probably parts of a suite of factors responsible for suppressing V. destructor populations in RHB colonies.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The hygienic removal of Apis mellifera brood infested with Varroa destructor disrupts the reproduction of the infesting mites, and exposes the foundress mites to potential removal from the colony by grooming. Using brood deliberately infested with marked mites, we investigated the association between the removal of mite-infested brood and the removal of exposed foundress mites in Italian (IHB) and Russian honey bee (RHB) colonies. Our results showed that RHB colonies removed more mite-infested brood in significantly less time (average = 87.9 ± 2.0% for 2.6 ± 0.1 days) than IHB colonies (average = 61.9 ± 7.3% for 3.2 ± 0.1 days or 19.3% per day). For the inoculated brood that was not removed, RHB colonies had lower proportions of brood cells containing: (a) live marked mites regardless of reproductive status (RHB = 4.4 ± 1.3%; IHB = 17.7 ± 5.9%); (b) dead marked mites (RHB = 1.1 ± 0.5%; IHB = 7.1 ± 2.2%); (c) lost introduced marked mites (RHB = 6.6 ± 1.6%; IHB = 13.3 ± 2.8%); and (d) reproductive marked mites (RHB = 8.3 ± 6.3%; IHB = 23.8 ± 6.9%) than IHB colonies did. These observations suggest that RHB colonies indiscriminately remove mite-infested brood regardless of mite status. Regarding trapped mites (i.e., those found below a modified queen excluder), the number of mite-infested brood cells removed positively correlated with the number of mites that were trapped in both honey bee stocks. The majority of the trapped mites fell during the first three days post mite inoculation, which coincided with the highest rates of brood removal. The highest proportions of trapped gravid foundress mites were also recorded during this time, when host bees were early in their development. The comparatively strong and rapid hygienic response of RHB to mite-infested brood and the associated removal of infesting foundresses are probably parts of a suite of factors responsible for suppressing V. destructor populations in RHB colonies.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The hygienic removal of Apis mellifera brood infested with Varroa destructor disrupts the reproduction of the infesting mites, and exposes the foundress mites to potential removal from the colony by grooming. Using brood deliberately infested with marked mites, we investigated the association between the removal of mite-infested brood and the removal of exposed foundress mites in Italian (IHB) and Russian honey bee (RHB) colonies. Our results showed that RHB colonies removed more mite-infested brood in significantly less time (average = 87.9 ± 2.0% for 2.6 ± 0.1 days) than IHB colonies (average = 61.9 ± 7.3% for 3.2 ± 0.1 days or 19.3% per day). For the inoculated brood that was not removed, RHB colonies had lower proportions of brood cells containing: (a) live marked mites regardless of reproductive status (RHB = 4.4 ± 1.3%; IHB = 17.7 ± 5.9%); (b) dead marked mites (RHB = 1.1 ± 0.5%; IHB = 7.1 ± 2.2%); (c) lost introduced marked mites (RHB = 6.6 ± 1.6%; IHB = 13.3 ± 2.8%); and (d) reproductive marked mites (RHB = 8.3 ± 6.3%; IHB = 23.8 ± 6.9%) than IHB colonies did. These observations suggest that RHB colonies indiscriminately remove mite-infested brood regardless of mite status. Regarding trapped mites (i.e., those found below a modified queen excluder), the number of mite-infested brood cells removed positively correlated with the number of mites that were trapped in both honey bee stocks. The majority of the trapped mites fell during the first three days post mite inoculation, which coincided with the highest rates of brood removal. The highest proportions of trapped gravid foundress mites were also recorded during this time, when host bees were early in their development. The comparatively strong and rapid hygienic response of RHB to mite-infested brood and the associated removal of infesting foundresses are probably parts of a suite of factors responsible for suppressing V. destructor populations in RHB colonies.

Key concepts: Brood, Varroa destructor, Biology, Mite, Varroa, Destructor, Honey bee, Acari

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Brood removal influences fall of Varroa destructor in honey bee colonies — Research Paper | ScholarLens