1990PubMedRequires access

Neuron-specific enolase in small-cell carcinoma of the lung: the value of combined immunocytochemistry and serum determination.

T. Esscher, Jonas Bergh, Lena Steinholtz, Nõu E, Kenneth Nilsson, Sven Påhlman

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as a marker for small-cell carcinoma of the lung has been the subject of several reports. Taken together, about 70 per cent of patients with small-cell carcinoma had a raised serum concentration of NSE, and in a majority of patients NSE could be detected immunocytochemically in tumor biopsy speciments. This study examined the diagnostic value of combined immunocytochemical detection and serum determination of NSE in 96 unselected patients with small-cell carcinoma. Seventy-one patients had raised serum concentrations and in 69 a positive immunoreaction for NSE was demonstrated in the biopsy cells. However, for 87 (91%) of the patients, both or either of the NSE assays were positive. The combined use of immunocytochemistry and serum determinations thus gave better information on tumor NSE expression than either method alone. When patients with small or mechanically maltreated biopsy specimens were excluded, the accuracy of the combined assays was even higher (47/49, 96%). We therefore conclude that NSE, although not a specific marker for small-cell carcinoma of the lung, is useful as a complement to conventional diagnostic procedures and, when assayed both in biopsy material and in patient sera, tumor NSE expression can be demonstrated with a high precision.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as a marker for small-cell carcinoma of the lung has been the subject of several reports. Taken together, about 70 per cent of patients with small-cell carcinoma had a raised serum concentration of NSE, and in a majority of patients NSE could be detected immunocytochemically in tumor biopsy speciments. This study examined the diagnostic value of combined immunocytochemical detection and serum determination of NSE in 96 unselected patients with small-cell carcinoma. Seventy-one patients had raised serum concentrations and in 69 a positive immunoreaction for NSE was demonstrated in the biopsy cells. However, for 87 (91%) of the patients, both or either of the NSE assays were positive. The combined use of immunocytochemistry and serum determinations thus gave better information on tumor NSE expression than either method alone. When patients with small or mechanically maltreated biopsy specimens were excluded, the accuracy of the combined assays was even higher (47/49, 96%). We therefore conclude that NSE, although not a specific marker for small-cell carcinoma of the lung, is useful as a complement to conventional diagnostic procedures and, when assayed both in biopsy material and in patient sera, tumor NSE expression can be demonstrated with a high precision.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The value of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) as a marker for small-cell carcinoma of the lung has been the subject of several reports. Taken together, about 70 per cent of patients with small-cell carcinoma had a raised serum concentration of NSE, and in a majority of patients NSE could be detected immunocytochemically in tumor biopsy speciments. This study examined the diagnostic value of combined immunocytochemical detection and serum determination of NSE in 96 unselected patients with small-cell carcinoma. Seventy-one patients had raised serum concentrations and in 69 a positive immunoreaction for NSE was demonstrated in the biopsy cells. However, for 87 (91%) of the patients, both or either of the NSE assays were positive. The combined use of immunocytochemistry and serum determinations thus gave better information on tumor NSE expression than either method alone. When patients with small or mechanically maltreated biopsy specimens were excluded, the accuracy of the combined assays was even higher (47/49, 96%). We therefore conclude that NSE, although not a specific marker for small-cell carcinoma of the lung, is useful as a complement to conventional diagnostic procedures and, when assayed both in biopsy material and in patient sera, tumor NSE expression can be demonstrated with a high precision.

Key concepts: Enolase, Immunocytochemistry, Pathology, Carcinoma, Biopsy, Small-cell carcinoma, Medicine, Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Neuron-specific enolase in small-cell carcinoma of the lung: the value of combined immunocytochemistry and serum determination. — Research Paper | ScholarLens