Efficacy evaluation of three different kinds of repellent.
Zheng Jian, Chao Chen
Abstract
Zheng Jian, Chao Chen
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the repellency of deet,IR3535 and bayrepel against mosquitoes.Methods Efficacy test of deet,IR3535,bayrepel was conducted according to GB/T 17322.10-1998,then evaluating the test data.Results Laboratory tests showed that at the concentration of 5%-10%,the efficacy of 3 repellents had no distinct difference;at the concentration of 15%-20%,the efficacy of 3 repellents had distinct difference,bayrepel was the best,the protection time of 20% bayrepel was 11 h against Aedes albopictus;field evaluations showed that the protection time of 20% bayrepel was 9 h against mosquitoes.Conclusion Bayrepel is an ideal repellent with high stability,long lasting effect,low toxicity.It also has a good prospect.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Objective To evaluate the repellency of deet,IR3535 and bayrepel against mosquitoes.Methods Efficacy test of deet,IR3535,bayrepel was conducted according to GB/T 17322.10-1998,then evaluating the test data.Results Laboratory tests showed that at the concentration of 5%-10%,the efficacy of 3 repellents had no distinct difference;at the concentration of 15%-20%,the efficacy of 3 repellents had distinct difference,bayrepel was the best,the protection time of 20% bayrepel was 11 h against Aedes albopictus;field evaluations showed that the protection time of 20% bayrepel was 9 h against mosquitoes.Conclusion Bayrepel is an ideal repellent with high stability,long lasting effect,low toxicity.It also has a good prospect.
Key concepts: DEET, Toxicology, Significant difference, Biology, Mathematics, Statistics