The Disclosure Quality of Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) and Corporate Governance
Byun, Hae-young, Lee, A-Young
Abstract
Byun, Hae-young, Lee, A-Young
Abstract
This study examines the association between corporate governance system and the disclosure quality of the Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) reported by Korean public firms, using MD&A disclosure data and corporate governance index. Since MD&A disclosures have become mandatory in 2009, firms have increased their MD&A disclosure quality as a part of a firm’s overall disclosure package. This study provides evidence that a sound corporate governance system can increase MD&A disclosure quality. In particular, the board of directors and the corporate disclosure practices among the corporate governance categories play an important role in determining MD&A disclosure quality. However, this study is unable to determine that shareholder rights protection is likely to affect MD&A disclosure quality. In conclusion, better-governed firms have followed MD&A guideline requirements well provided by the Korean Financial Supervisory Service(FSS) in their MD&A disclosure.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This study examines the association between corporate governance system and the disclosure quality of the Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) reported by Korean public firms, using MD&A disclosure data and corporate governance index. Since MD&A disclosures have become mandatory in 2009, firms have increased their MD&A disclosure quality as a part of a firm’s overall disclosure package. This study provides evidence that a sound corporate governance system can increase MD&A disclosure quality. In particular, the board of directors and the corporate disclosure practices among the corporate governance categories play an important role in determining MD&A disclosure quality. However, this study is unable to determine that shareholder rights protection is likely to affect MD&A disclosure quality. In conclusion, better-governed firms have followed MD&A guideline requirements well provided by the Korean Financial Supervisory Service(FSS) in their MD&A disclosure.
Key concepts: Corporate governance, Accounting, Business, Quality (philosophy), Shareholder, Public disclosure, Affect (linguistics), Finance