2015회계연구Requires access

The Disclosure Quality of Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) and Corporate Governance

Byun, Hae-young, Lee, A-Young

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This study examines the association between corporate governance system and the disclosure quality of the Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) reported by Korean public firms, using MD&A disclosure data and corporate governance index. Since MD&A disclosures have become mandatory in 2009, firms have increased their MD&A disclosure quality as a part of a firm’s overall disclosure package. This study provides evidence that a sound corporate governance system can increase MD&A disclosure quality. In particular, the board of directors and the corporate disclosure practices among the corporate governance categories play an important role in determining MD&A disclosure quality. However, this study is unable to determine that shareholder rights protection is likely to affect MD&A disclosure quality. In conclusion, better-governed firms have followed MD&A guideline requirements well provided by the Korean Financial Supervisory Service(FSS) in their MD&A disclosure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study examines the association between corporate governance system and the disclosure quality of the Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) reported by Korean public firms, using MD&A disclosure data and corporate governance index. Since MD&A disclosures have become mandatory in 2009, firms have increased their MD&A disclosure quality as a part of a firm’s overall disclosure package. This study provides evidence that a sound corporate governance system can increase MD&A disclosure quality. In particular, the board of directors and the corporate disclosure practices among the corporate governance categories play an important role in determining MD&A disclosure quality. However, this study is unable to determine that shareholder rights protection is likely to affect MD&A disclosure quality. In conclusion, better-governed firms have followed MD&A guideline requirements well provided by the Korean Financial Supervisory Service(FSS) in their MD&A disclosure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study examines the association between corporate governance system and the disclosure quality of the Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) reported by Korean public firms, using MD&A disclosure data and corporate governance index. Since MD&A disclosures have become mandatory in 2009, firms have increased their MD&A disclosure quality as a part of a firm’s overall disclosure package. This study provides evidence that a sound corporate governance system can increase MD&A disclosure quality. In particular, the board of directors and the corporate disclosure practices among the corporate governance categories play an important role in determining MD&A disclosure quality. However, this study is unable to determine that shareholder rights protection is likely to affect MD&A disclosure quality. In conclusion, better-governed firms have followed MD&A guideline requirements well provided by the Korean Financial Supervisory Service(FSS) in their MD&A disclosure.

Key concepts: Corporate governance, Accounting, Business, Quality (philosophy), Shareholder, Public disclosure, Affect (linguistics), Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Disclosure Quality of Management Discussion and Analysis(MD&A) and Corporate Governance — Research Paper | ScholarLens