2015RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

COMPARATIVE CONTACT LAW DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CIVILIAN LEGAL SYSTEMS ,THE COMMON LAW AND THE ALBANIAN CONTAC

Brunela Kullolli, Madrid Kullolli

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This article analysis the comparative contract law differences between civilian legal systems, the common law and the Albanian law , as well as between French and German law as two main exponents of the civil law tradition , to some extent, even between English and US-American law .- The first part gives , the origins of modern comparative law in the civil law world - of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and in that world, contracts have been widely considered the pre-eminent area of law The second, modern comparative law soon began to focus particularly on the study of the similarities and differences between the civil law and the common law, and contract law turned out to be an enormously fertile field for such studies.-The third part addresses Third, contract law is a favourite topic for comparative study because it is among the practically most salient areas of law, both in terms of economic importance and in terms of the realities of international negotiation and litigation.- The Fourth part treats a number of differences between civil law commun , common law the Albanian contact law. Conclusions The overview provided in this article has revealed a number of differences between civilian legal systems and the common law, and also between French and German law as two main exponents of the civil-law tradition and, to some extent, even between English and US-American law. The same is true of other major issues in the field of general contract law that have not been touched upon: contractual capacity, mistake, agency or assignment.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article analysis the comparative contract law differences between civilian legal systems, the common law and the Albanian law , as well as between French and German law as two main exponents of the civil law tradition , to some extent, even between English and US-American law .- The first part gives , the origins of modern comparative law in the civil law world - of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and in that world, contracts have been widely considered the pre-eminent area of law The second, modern comparative law soon began to focus particularly on the study of the similarities and differences between the civil law and the common law, and contract law turned out to be an enormously fertile field for such studies.-The third part addresses Third, contract law is a favourite topic for comparative study because it is among the practically most salient areas of law, both in terms of economic importance and in terms of the realities of international negotiation and litigation.- The Fourth part treats a number of differences between civil law commun , common law the Albanian contact law. Conclusions The overview provided in this article has revealed a number of differences between civilian legal systems and the common law, and also between French and German law as two main exponents of the civil-law tradition and, to some extent, even between English and US-American law. The same is true of other major issues in the field of general contract law that have not been touched upon: contractual capacity, mistake, agency or assignment.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article analysis the comparative contract law differences between civilian legal systems, the common law and the Albanian law , as well as between French and German law as two main exponents of the civil law tradition , to some extent, even between English and US-American law .- The first part gives , the origins of modern comparative law in the civil law world - of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, and in that world, contracts have been widely considered the pre-eminent area of law The second, modern comparative law soon began to focus particularly on the study of the similarities and differences between the civil law and the common law, and contract law turned out to be an enormously fertile field for such studies.-The third part addresses Third, contract law is a favourite topic for comparative study because it is among the practically most salient areas of law, both in terms of economic importance and in terms of the realities of international negotiation and litigation.- The Fourth part treats a number of differences between civil law commun , common law the Albanian contact law. Conclusions The overview provided in this article has revealed a number of differences between civilian legal systems and the common law, and also between French and German law as two main exponents of the civil-law tradition and, to some extent, even between English and US-American law. The same is true of other major issues in the field of general contract law that have not been touched upon: contractual capacity, mistake, agency or assignment.

Key concepts: Civil law (Civil law), Comparative law, Law, Public law, Private law, Common law, Municipal law, Political science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
COMPARATIVE CONTACT LAW DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CIVILIAN LEGAL SYSTEMS ,THE COMMON LAW AND THE ALBANIAN CONTAC — Research Paper | ScholarLens