2015•RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

International Trade and Private Standards: Discussions in the WTO and initiatives outside the WTO (Japanese)

Yoshiko Naiki

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Private standards have emerged and proliferated in various fields, such as food, forestry, minerals, and services. The proliferation of private standards has been positively perceived as a new governance mode by private actors, addressing social, environmental, and ethical issues with which state governments have not fully dealt. However, the increase and fragmentation of private standards raise several problems. For instance, consumers may be confused with multiple private standard systems and do not understand their differences. Producers may not understand which standard is more suitable for their own production and business. What is worse, producers may choose to be certified by a weaker standard system because of loose monitoring procedures. This paper explores varied responses to mitigate such negative consequences from the fragmentation of private standards. This paper first looks at how private standards have been addressed in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Committee of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Then, it examines three other initiatives and approaches outside the WTO, dealing with the increase of private standards: (1) the ISEAL Alliance's Codes for defining credible standards; (2) attempts to examine market impacts and effectiveness of private standards; and (3) the International Trade Centre's "Standards Map" database. This paper concludes by pointing out important topics to be addressed in future research.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Private standards have emerged and proliferated in various fields, such as food, forestry, minerals, and services. The proliferation of private standards has been positively perceived as a new governance mode by private actors, addressing social, environmental, and ethical issues with which state governments have not fully dealt. However, the increase and fragmentation of private standards raise several problems. For instance, consumers may be confused with multiple private standard systems and do not understand their differences. Producers may not understand which standard is more suitable for their own production and business. What is worse, producers may choose to be certified by a weaker standard system because of loose monitoring procedures. This paper explores varied responses to mitigate such negative consequences from the fragmentation of private standards. This paper first looks at how private standards have been addressed in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Committee of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Then, it examines three other initiatives and approaches outside the WTO, dealing with the increase of private standards: (1) the ISEAL Alliance's Codes for defining credible standards; (2) attempts to examine market impacts and effectiveness of private standards; and (3) the International Trade Centre's "Standards Map" database. This paper concludes by pointing out important topics to be addressed in future research.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Private standards have emerged and proliferated in various fields, such as food, forestry, minerals, and services. The proliferation of private standards has been positively perceived as a new governance mode by private actors, addressing social, environmental, and ethical issues with which state governments have not fully dealt. However, the increase and fragmentation of private standards raise several problems. For instance, consumers may be confused with multiple private standard systems and do not understand their differences. Producers may not understand which standard is more suitable for their own production and business. What is worse, producers may choose to be certified by a weaker standard system because of loose monitoring procedures. This paper explores varied responses to mitigate such negative consequences from the fragmentation of private standards. This paper first looks at how private standards have been addressed in the Sanitary and Phytosanitary (SPS) Committee of the World Trade Organization (WTO). Then, it examines three other initiatives and approaches outside the WTO, dealing with the increase of private standards: (1) the ISEAL Alliance's Codes for defining credible standards; (2) attempts to examine market impacts and effectiveness of private standards; and (3) the International Trade Centre's "Standards Map" database. This paper concludes by pointing out important topics to be addressed in future research.

Key concepts: Certification, Alliance, Technical barriers to trade, Corporate governance, Business, Private sector, International trade, Transnational governance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
International Trade and Private Standards: Discussions in the WTO and initiatives outside the WTO (Japanese) — Research Paper | ScholarLens