1955American Journal of Tropical Medicine and HygieneRequires access

IV. Diarrheal Disease Control Studies

William H. Stewart, Leland J. McCabe, Emmarie C. Hemphill, Thelma DeCapito

Open publisher page 48 citations

Abstract

SummaryThe relationship of some general environmental factors to the prevalence of Shigella infections and, more specifically, the effects of the availability of water for washing purposes on shigellosis rates were studied. The areas under observation were divided, either by city blocks, parts of blocks, or premises into groups with similar sanitational features. After each environmental grouping was completed, the infection rates for each of the groups was found.Three conclusions which are applicable to diarrheal disease control were drawn from the results. 1. Areas could be defined by using common sanitational standards to indicate potentials for spread of Shigella organisms. 2. Infection rates of a neighborhood were found to vary with the proportion of poor housing in it. 3. Infection rates were highest where water was least available for personal hygiene. Consequently, availability of water for washing purposes must be considered along with purity of water in any diarrheal disease control program.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

SummaryThe relationship of some general environmental factors to the prevalence of Shigella infections and, more specifically, the effects of the availability of water for washing purposes on shigellosis rates were studied. The areas under observation were divided, either by city blocks, parts of blocks, or premises into groups with similar sanitational features. After each environmental grouping was completed, the infection rates for each of the groups was found.Three conclusions which are applicable to diarrheal disease control were drawn from the results. 1. Areas could be defined by using common sanitational standards to indicate potentials for spread of Shigella organisms. 2. Infection rates of a neighborhood were found to vary with the proportion of poor housing in it. 3. Infection rates were highest where water was least available for personal hygiene. Consequently, availability of water for washing purposes must be considered along with purity of water in any diarrheal disease control program.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 48 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

SummaryThe relationship of some general environmental factors to the prevalence of Shigella infections and, more specifically, the effects of the availability of water for washing purposes on shigellosis rates were studied. The areas under observation were divided, either by city blocks, parts of blocks, or premises into groups with similar sanitational features. After each environmental grouping was completed, the infection rates for each of the groups was found.Three conclusions which are applicable to diarrheal disease control were drawn from the results. 1. Areas could be defined by using common sanitational standards to indicate potentials for spread of Shigella organisms. 2. Infection rates of a neighborhood were found to vary with the proportion of poor housing in it. 3. Infection rates were highest where water was least available for personal hygiene. Consequently, availability of water for washing purposes must be considered along with purity of water in any diarrheal disease control program.

Key concepts: Shigellosis, Diarrheal disease, Diarrheal diseases, Shigella, Hygiene, Environmental health, Personal hygiene, Waterborne diseases

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
IV. Diarrheal Disease Control Studies — Research Paper | ScholarLens