2015Journal of Sport and Human PerformanceOpen access

Static and dynamic stretching and its effects on hamstring flexibility, horizontal jump, vertical jump, and a 50 meter sprint

Kimberly Berenbaum, Binh Bui, Sal Megaro, Melissa A. Whidden

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Preactivity stretching is commonly performed by active individuals as part of their warm-up routine.  While both static and dynamic stretching are techniques utilized by the everyday exerciser, it has been questioned as to whether these types of stretching protocols can be harmful or beneficial to anaerobic exercise performance.  The current literature on stretching has also been biased toward athletes.  Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether 3 weeks of either static or dynamic hamstring stretching affects range of motion (ROM) and anaerobic exercise performance in recreationally active individuals.  Twenty two healthy college-aged students were randomly divided into three groups; static stretching (n=9), dynamic stretching (n=8), or no-stretch control (n=5).  Subjects completed three weeks of the stretching protocol with measurements taken before and after the stretching regimen.  ROM of the hamstrings were measured via the sit and reach test and the active knee extension test (AKET) while three variables of anaerobic performance (horizontal jump, vertical jump, and 50 meter sprint) were analyzed.  Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (P<0.05) between groups for the horizontal jump (P=0.261), vertical jump (P=0.983), or the 50 meter sprint (P=0.899).  Furthermore, three weeks of either static or dynamic hamstring stretching did not improve ROM in our active subjects.  Therefore, based on the current investigation, static stretching does not negatively impact anaerobic exercise performance, while dynamic stretching may not be as beneficial to an exercise routine as previously thought.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Preactivity stretching is commonly performed by active individuals as part of their warm-up routine.  While both static and dynamic stretching are techniques utilized by the everyday exerciser, it has been questioned as to whether these types of stretching protocols can be harmful or beneficial to anaerobic exercise performance.  The current literature on stretching has also been biased toward athletes.  Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether 3 weeks of either static or dynamic hamstring stretching affects range of motion (ROM) and anaerobic exercise performance in recreationally active individuals.  Twenty two healthy college-aged students were randomly divided into three groups; static stretching (n=9), dynamic stretching (n=8), or no-stretch control (n=5).  Subjects completed three weeks of the stretching protocol with measurements taken before and after the stretching regimen.  ROM of the hamstrings were measured via the sit and reach test and the active knee extension test (AKET) while three variables of anaerobic performance (horizontal jump, vertical jump, and 50 meter sprint) were analyzed.  Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (P<0.05) between groups for the horizontal jump (P=0.261), vertical jump (P=0.983), or the 50 meter sprint (P=0.899).  Furthermore, three weeks of either static or dynamic hamstring stretching did not improve ROM in our active subjects.  Therefore, based on the current investigation, static stretching does not negatively impact anaerobic exercise performance, while dynamic stretching may not be as beneficial to an exercise routine as previously thought.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Preactivity stretching is commonly performed by active individuals as part of their warm-up routine.  While both static and dynamic stretching are techniques utilized by the everyday exerciser, it has been questioned as to whether these types of stretching protocols can be harmful or beneficial to anaerobic exercise performance.  The current literature on stretching has also been biased toward athletes.  Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate whether 3 weeks of either static or dynamic hamstring stretching affects range of motion (ROM) and anaerobic exercise performance in recreationally active individuals.  Twenty two healthy college-aged students were randomly divided into three groups; static stretching (n=9), dynamic stretching (n=8), or no-stretch control (n=5).  Subjects completed three weeks of the stretching protocol with measurements taken before and after the stretching regimen.  ROM of the hamstrings were measured via the sit and reach test and the active knee extension test (AKET) while three variables of anaerobic performance (horizontal jump, vertical jump, and 50 meter sprint) were analyzed.  Statistical analysis showed no significant differences (P<0.05) between groups for the horizontal jump (P=0.261), vertical jump (P=0.983), or the 50 meter sprint (P=0.899).  Furthermore, three weeks of either static or dynamic hamstring stretching did not improve ROM in our active subjects.  Therefore, based on the current investigation, static stretching does not negatively impact anaerobic exercise performance, while dynamic stretching may not be as beneficial to an exercise routine as previously thought.

Key concepts: Sprint, Static stretching, Vertical jump, Hamstring, Jump, Anaerobic exercise, Flexibility (engineering), Simulation

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Static and dynamic stretching and its effects on hamstring flexibility, horizontal jump, vertical jump, and a 50 meter sprint — Research Paper | ScholarLens