1981OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Requires access

Logic of the N-bomb. [Neutron bombs]

S. T. Cohen

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

President Reagan's deferral to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) resistance against deploying neutron weapons on European soil climaxes 20 years of US indecision on whether the use of such weapons would escalate to full-scale nuclear war. Arguments against the use of battlefield nuclear weapons have been public and have spread from the media to the national and international scene. An explanation of the bomb's history notes that military technology is always antipersonnel because people are easier to destroy than structures and that efforts to develop a clean class of thermonuclear weapons focused on reducing widespread fallout rather than a low yield. A review of enhanced radiation (ER) weaponry and the debates of the past three decades emphasizes the implications to NATO defense and the credibility of our tactical nuclear posture. (DCK)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

President Reagan's deferral to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) resistance against deploying neutron weapons on European soil climaxes 20 years of US indecision on whether the use of such weapons would escalate to full-scale nuclear war. Arguments against the use of battlefield nuclear weapons have been public and have spread from the media to the national and international scene. An explanation of the bomb's history notes that military technology is always antipersonnel because people are easier to destroy than structures and that efforts to develop a clean class of thermonuclear weapons focused on reducing widespread fallout rather than a low yield. A review of enhanced radiation (ER) weaponry and the debates of the past three decades emphasizes the implications to NATO defense and the credibility of our tactical nuclear posture. (DCK)

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

President Reagan's deferral to North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) resistance against deploying neutron weapons on European soil climaxes 20 years of US indecision on whether the use of such weapons would escalate to full-scale nuclear war. Arguments against the use of battlefield nuclear weapons have been public and have spread from the media to the national and international scene. An explanation of the bomb's history notes that military technology is always antipersonnel because people are easier to destroy than structures and that efforts to develop a clean class of thermonuclear weapons focused on reducing widespread fallout rather than a low yield. A review of enhanced radiation (ER) weaponry and the debates of the past three decades emphasizes the implications to NATO defense and the credibility of our tactical nuclear posture. (DCK)

Key concepts: Nuclear weapon, Credibility, Treaty, Political science, North Atlantic Treaty, Arms control, Law, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Logic of the N-bomb. [Neutron bombs] — Research Paper | ScholarLens