2010•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Medical Malpractice Tort Reform in Texas: Treating Symptoms Rather than Seeking a Cure

Geraldine Szott Moohr, Roger Sherman

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

The authors examine the consequences of medical malpractice tort reform in Texas and conclude that it has not actually discouraged the negligent practice of medicine in Texas. The state limited non-economic damage awards in medical malpractice cases and thereby reduced malpractice insurance premiums, but this treated only a symptom and did not address the underlying problem of malpractice. Several alternatives are proposed that would create a balance between compensating the most seriously injured plaintiffs and properly penalizing negligent doctors. Ensuring that patients receive adequate information about providers, increasing the use of physician gatekeepers in health insurance plans, and increased action from state medical boards are among the solutions offered to move the focus beyond insurance fees and back to reducing malpractice itself.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The authors examine the consequences of medical malpractice tort reform in Texas and conclude that it has not actually discouraged the negligent practice of medicine in Texas. The state limited non-economic damage awards in medical malpractice cases and thereby reduced malpractice insurance premiums, but this treated only a symptom and did not address the underlying problem of malpractice. Several alternatives are proposed that would create a balance between compensating the most seriously injured plaintiffs and properly penalizing negligent doctors. Ensuring that patients receive adequate information about providers, increasing the use of physician gatekeepers in health insurance plans, and increased action from state medical boards are among the solutions offered to move the focus beyond insurance fees and back to reducing malpractice itself.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The authors examine the consequences of medical malpractice tort reform in Texas and conclude that it has not actually discouraged the negligent practice of medicine in Texas. The state limited non-economic damage awards in medical malpractice cases and thereby reduced malpractice insurance premiums, but this treated only a symptom and did not address the underlying problem of malpractice. Several alternatives are proposed that would create a balance between compensating the most seriously injured plaintiffs and properly penalizing negligent doctors. Ensuring that patients receive adequate information about providers, increasing the use of physician gatekeepers in health insurance plans, and increased action from state medical boards are among the solutions offered to move the focus beyond insurance fees and back to reducing malpractice itself.

Key concepts: Malpractice, Tort reform, Plaintiff, Tort, Medical malpractice, Balance (ability), Defensive medicine, Damages

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Medical Malpractice Tort Reform in Texas: Treating Symptoms Rather than Seeking a Cure — Research Paper | ScholarLens