1997PubMedRequires access

Why don't more Israelis wear seat belts in the back seat?--a possible explanation.

Ressler Wh

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Most Israelis wear seat belts in the front seat of automobiles; most do not wear them in the back. A possible explanation is considered, that Israelis believe seat belts to be less necessary in the back, and that this is related to the relative discrepancy in seat belt use. METHOD: A telephone survey of 1148 Israeli adults was conducted in September 1996, using random-digit dialing. RESULTS: On a six-point scale of perceived risk, respondents rated seat belts as more necessary for passengers in the front than in the back seat [D = 0.6, SD = 1.0, t (873) = 18.3; p < .001]. Moreover, respondents' self-reported use of seat belts in the back seat (35% overall) was significantly higher among respondents who believed seat belts in the back to be necessary [46%; chi 2 (N = 882, df = 2) = 20.6; p < .001)], yet was not significantly higher among respondents who believed wearing seat belts in the front to be necessary [38%; chi 2 (N = 903, df = 2) = 3.8; p > .05)]. Respondents' reports of buckling their children in the back seat (55% overall) were significantly higher among respondents who believed seat belts in the back to be necessary [62%; chi 2 (N = 309, df = 2) = 7.0; p < .05)], yet were not significantly higher among respondents who believed wearing seat belts in the front to be necessary [57%; chi 2 (N = 313, df = 2) = 0.9; p > .05)]. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a potentially effective strategy in Israel for promoting the use of seat belts in the back seat of automobiles should include convincing the public of the necessity of wearing seat belts in the back, by increasing the perceived risk of injury to back seat passengers.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Most Israelis wear seat belts in the front seat of automobiles; most do not wear them in the back. A possible explanation is considered, that Israelis believe seat belts to be less necessary in the back, and that this is related to the relative discrepancy in seat belt use. METHOD: A telephone survey of 1148 Israeli adults was conducted in September 1996, using random-digit dialing. RESULTS: On a six-point scale of perceived risk, respondents rated seat belts as more necessary for passengers in the front than in the back seat [D = 0.6, SD = 1.0, t (873) = 18.3; p < .001]. Moreover, respondents' self-reported use of seat belts in the back seat (35% overall) was significantly higher among respondents who believed seat belts in the back to be necessary [46%; chi 2 (N = 882, df = 2) = 20.6; p < .001)], yet was not significantly higher among respondents who believed wearing seat belts in the front to be necessary [38%; chi 2 (N = 903, df = 2) = 3.8; p > .05)]. Respondents' reports of buckling their children in the back seat (55% overall) were significantly higher among respondents who believed seat belts in the back to be necessary [62%; chi 2 (N = 309, df = 2) = 7.0; p < .05)], yet were not significantly higher among respondents who believed wearing seat belts in the front to be necessary [57%; chi 2 (N = 313, df = 2) = 0.9; p > .05)]. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a potentially effective strategy in Israel for promoting the use of seat belts in the back seat of automobiles should include convincing the public of the necessity of wearing seat belts in the back, by increasing the perceived risk of injury to back seat passengers.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Most Israelis wear seat belts in the front seat of automobiles; most do not wear them in the back. A possible explanation is considered, that Israelis believe seat belts to be less necessary in the back, and that this is related to the relative discrepancy in seat belt use. METHOD: A telephone survey of 1148 Israeli adults was conducted in September 1996, using random-digit dialing. RESULTS: On a six-point scale of perceived risk, respondents rated seat belts as more necessary for passengers in the front than in the back seat [D = 0.6, SD = 1.0, t (873) = 18.3; p < .001]. Moreover, respondents' self-reported use of seat belts in the back seat (35% overall) was significantly higher among respondents who believed seat belts in the back to be necessary [46%; chi 2 (N = 882, df = 2) = 20.6; p < .001)], yet was not significantly higher among respondents who believed wearing seat belts in the front to be necessary [38%; chi 2 (N = 903, df = 2) = 3.8; p > .05)]. Respondents' reports of buckling their children in the back seat (55% overall) were significantly higher among respondents who believed seat belts in the back to be necessary [62%; chi 2 (N = 309, df = 2) = 7.0; p < .05)], yet were not significantly higher among respondents who believed wearing seat belts in the front to be necessary [57%; chi 2 (N = 313, df = 2) = 0.9; p > .05)]. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that a potentially effective strategy in Israel for promoting the use of seat belts in the back seat of automobiles should include convincing the public of the necessity of wearing seat belts in the back, by increasing the perceived risk of injury to back seat passengers.

Key concepts: Seat belt, Front (military), Telephone interview, Demography, Telephone survey, Poison control, Injury prevention, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Why don't more Israelis wear seat belts in the back seat?--a possible explanation. — Research Paper | ScholarLens