2011SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Moved by Illegality? Experimental Approaches to Public Opinion on Immigration

Jennifer L. Merolla, S. Karthick Ramakrishnan

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

In the United States, immigrants and immigration policy are complex and multi-faceted, with persons of different legal status, visa categories, and national origins. Despite this complexity, media coverage and Congressional debate has focused inordinately on the issue of undocumented (or illegal) immigration. Even with the topic of illegal migration, there is vigorous debate among advocates over whether the term undocumented or illegal favors one side over the other. In this paper, we rely on survey experiments to determine if the American electorate makes meaningful distinctions between legal and illegal immigration when it comes to attitudes and opinions on policy. Importantly, we also test for whether the public makes any distinctions between family visa and work visa holders among legal immigrants, and between those who are labeled as undocumented or unauthorized, as opposed to illegal.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

In the United States, immigrants and immigration policy are complex and multi-faceted, with persons of different legal status, visa categories, and national origins. Despite this complexity, media coverage and Congressional debate has focused inordinately on the issue of undocumented (or illegal) immigration. Even with the topic of illegal migration, there is vigorous debate among advocates over whether the term undocumented or illegal favors one side over the other. In this paper, we rely on survey experiments to determine if the American electorate makes meaningful distinctions between legal and illegal immigration when it comes to attitudes and opinions on policy. Importantly, we also test for whether the public makes any distinctions between family visa and work visa holders among legal immigrants, and between those who are labeled as undocumented or unauthorized, as opposed to illegal.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

In the United States, immigrants and immigration policy are complex and multi-faceted, with persons of different legal status, visa categories, and national origins. Despite this complexity, media coverage and Congressional debate has focused inordinately on the issue of undocumented (or illegal) immigration. Even with the topic of illegal migration, there is vigorous debate among advocates over whether the term undocumented or illegal favors one side over the other. In this paper, we rely on survey experiments to determine if the American electorate makes meaningful distinctions between legal and illegal immigration when it comes to attitudes and opinions on policy. Importantly, we also test for whether the public makes any distinctions between family visa and work visa holders among legal immigrants, and between those who are labeled as undocumented or unauthorized, as opposed to illegal.

Key concepts: Immigration, Public opinion, Illegal immigrants, Illegal immigration, Political science, Immigration policy, Immigration law, Immigration reform

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Moved by Illegality? Experimental Approaches to Public Opinion on Immigration — Research Paper | ScholarLens