2001Indian journal of plant protectionOpen access

Bioefficacy of Insecticides Against White Grub, Leucopholis lepidophora Blanch Infesting Arecanut Palm

Kesavan Subaharan, P. S. P. V. Vidyasagar, B. M. Mohammed Basheer

Open full text 4 citations

Abstract

The root infesting scarabaeid white grub, Leucopholis lepidophora Blanch is a major pest on arecanut in Western ghats area of Karnataka. In an attempt to identify an insecticide with enhanced bioaction against L. lepidophora, four insecticides viz., carbosulfan, tefluthrin, chlorpyriphos and phorate (standard insecticide) were screened for their toxicity in the laboratory and in the field. In laboratory bioassay studies, the order of toxicity observed was carbosulfan > tefluthrin > chlorpyriphos > phorate. On relative toxicity, carbosulfan was 4.2 times more toxic as compared to phorate followed by tefluthrin (2.8) and chlorpyriphos (1.9) in the case of II instar grubs. In III instar grubs carbosulfan was 13 times more toxic than phorate whereas, tefluthrin and chlorpyriphos were 12.5 and 2.7 times more toxic than phorate, respectively. A replicated field trial was taken up at arecanut gardens in Sringeri (Karnataka) for two years and the treatments were imposed during post monsoon season (1999 and 2000). Carbosulfan @ 20 g/palm during first and second years effected a mean reduction in grub population to a tune of 80.6% and 66%, respectively. Chlorpyriphos @ 8 ml/palm and carbosulfan @ 10 g/palm caused > 60% reduction in grub population during both the years of study. The standard insecticide phorate @ 10 g/palm caused a mean reduction of 36.43% and 44% during the respective years.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The root infesting scarabaeid white grub, Leucopholis lepidophora Blanch is a major pest on arecanut in Western ghats area of Karnataka. In an attempt to identify an insecticide with enhanced bioaction against L. lepidophora, four insecticides viz., carbosulfan, tefluthrin, chlorpyriphos and phorate (standard insecticide) were screened for their toxicity in the laboratory and in the field. In laboratory bioassay studies, the order of toxicity observed was carbosulfan > tefluthrin > chlorpyriphos > phorate. On relative toxicity, carbosulfan was 4.2 times more toxic as compared to phorate followed by tefluthrin (2.8) and chlorpyriphos (1.9) in the case of II instar grubs. In III instar grubs carbosulfan was 13 times more toxic than phorate whereas, tefluthrin and chlorpyriphos were 12.5 and 2.7 times more toxic than phorate, respectively. A replicated field trial was taken up at arecanut gardens in Sringeri (Karnataka) for two years and the treatments were imposed during post monsoon season (1999 and 2000). Carbosulfan @ 20 g/palm during first and second years effected a mean reduction in grub population to a tune of 80.6% and 66%, respectively. Chlorpyriphos @ 8 ml/palm and carbosulfan @ 10 g/palm caused > 60% reduction in grub population during both the years of study. The standard insecticide phorate @ 10 g/palm caused a mean reduction of 36.43% and 44% during the respective years.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The root infesting scarabaeid white grub, Leucopholis lepidophora Blanch is a major pest on arecanut in Western ghats area of Karnataka. In an attempt to identify an insecticide with enhanced bioaction against L. lepidophora, four insecticides viz., carbosulfan, tefluthrin, chlorpyriphos and phorate (standard insecticide) were screened for their toxicity in the laboratory and in the field. In laboratory bioassay studies, the order of toxicity observed was carbosulfan > tefluthrin > chlorpyriphos > phorate. On relative toxicity, carbosulfan was 4.2 times more toxic as compared to phorate followed by tefluthrin (2.8) and chlorpyriphos (1.9) in the case of II instar grubs. In III instar grubs carbosulfan was 13 times more toxic than phorate whereas, tefluthrin and chlorpyriphos were 12.5 and 2.7 times more toxic than phorate, respectively. A replicated field trial was taken up at arecanut gardens in Sringeri (Karnataka) for two years and the treatments were imposed during post monsoon season (1999 and 2000). Carbosulfan @ 20 g/palm during first and second years effected a mean reduction in grub population to a tune of 80.6% and 66%, respectively. Chlorpyriphos @ 8 ml/palm and carbosulfan @ 10 g/palm caused > 60% reduction in grub population during both the years of study. The standard insecticide phorate @ 10 g/palm caused a mean reduction of 36.43% and 44% during the respective years.

Key concepts: Phorate, Carbosulfan, Toxicology, Population, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Biotechnology, Pesticide

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Bioefficacy of Insecticides Against White Grub, Leucopholis lepidophora Blanch Infesting Arecanut Palm — Research Paper | ScholarLens