2011•JOURNAL OF HEALTH SCIENCEOpen access

Comparison of Antibody Detection between Immunoperoxidase (IIP) and Immunofluorescence (IFA) for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis (การเปรยบเทยบการตรวจแอนตบอดตอเชอเลปโตสไปราดวยวธ Immunoperoxidase (IIP) และวธ Immunofluorescence (IFA) ฯ)

Sarawut Suttirat, Taweeporn Phunpanich, Nirut Rodkhunthod, Boonnipa Suwannakan, Surasak Muenphon

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

A comparison of leptospiral antibody detection between IIP and IFA was performed on samples of serum collected from 27 leptospirosis patients and 43 negative controls consisting of 10 healthy controls, 20 individuals in endemic areas and 13 non-leptospirosis. The agreement rate when two methods were compared, was 0.97 by Kappa analysis and indicated a very good agreement. Antibody titer of positive samples resulting from IIP and IFA were compared. IIP gave more titer than IFA in 16 from 28 (57.2%), equivalent titer in 9 from 28 (32.1%) and less titer than IFA in 3 from 28 (10.7%). False positive was found in two samples, one sample of VDRL and TPHA positive case and another from individual in endemic area. This preliminary study showed that IIP might be an alternative method to IFA for antibody detection. The benefit of IIP over IFA was light microscope used and its possible application for field trial study. However, more sera should be tested before its effectiveness for serodiagnosis of leptospirosis can be concluded. Key words: leptospirosis, immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A comparison of leptospiral antibody detection between IIP and IFA was performed on samples of serum collected from 27 leptospirosis patients and 43 negative controls consisting of 10 healthy controls, 20 individuals in endemic areas and 13 non-leptospirosis. The agreement rate when two methods were compared, was 0.97 by Kappa analysis and indicated a very good agreement. Antibody titer of positive samples resulting from IIP and IFA were compared. IIP gave more titer than IFA in 16 from 28 (57.2%), equivalent titer in 9 from 28 (32.1%) and less titer than IFA in 3 from 28 (10.7%). False positive was found in two samples, one sample of VDRL and TPHA positive case and another from individual in endemic area. This preliminary study showed that IIP might be an alternative method to IFA for antibody detection. The benefit of IIP over IFA was light microscope used and its possible application for field trial study. However, more sera should be tested before its effectiveness for serodiagnosis of leptospirosis can be concluded. Key words: leptospirosis, immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A comparison of leptospiral antibody detection between IIP and IFA was performed on samples of serum collected from 27 leptospirosis patients and 43 negative controls consisting of 10 healthy controls, 20 individuals in endemic areas and 13 non-leptospirosis. The agreement rate when two methods were compared, was 0.97 by Kappa analysis and indicated a very good agreement. Antibody titer of positive samples resulting from IIP and IFA were compared. IIP gave more titer than IFA in 16 from 28 (57.2%), equivalent titer in 9 from 28 (32.1%) and less titer than IFA in 3 from 28 (10.7%). False positive was found in two samples, one sample of VDRL and TPHA positive case and another from individual in endemic area. This preliminary study showed that IIP might be an alternative method to IFA for antibody detection. The benefit of IIP over IFA was light microscope used and its possible application for field trial study. However, more sera should be tested before its effectiveness for serodiagnosis of leptospirosis can be concluded. Key words: leptospirosis, immunofluorescence, immunoperoxidase

Key concepts: Leptospirosis, Immunoperoxidase, Immunofluorescence, Titer, Antibody, Indirect immunofluorescence, Direct fluorescent antibody, Antibody titer

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of Antibody Detection between Immunoperoxidase (IIP) and Immunofluorescence (IFA) for Diagnosis of Leptospirosis (การเปรยบเทยบการตรวจแอนตบอดตอเชอเลปโตสไปราดวยวธ Immunoperoxidase (IIP) และวธ Immunofluorescence (IFA) ฯ) — Research Paper | ScholarLens