2015RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsOpen access

A novel approach to dynamic livelihood clustering: Empirical evidence from Nepal

Solomon Zena Walelign, Mariève Pouliot, Helle Overgaard Larsen, Carsten Smith‐Hall

Open full text 3 citations

Abstract

Rural households are heterogeneous: different socio-economic characteristics and asset endowments dictate their engagement with different livelihood activities resulting in different livelihood outcomes. Poverty reduction policies should consider this. Using a unique environmentally augmented three-wave panel dataset from 427 households in three locations of Nepal, we proposed an approach that combines households' income and assets to identify different livelihood strategy clusters. Based on a Latent Markov Model we identify seven distinct livelihood strategies and analyse households' movements between strategies through time. Most sampled households changed their livelihood strategy at least once between 2006 and 2012, and very few households transited directly from the least to the most remunerative strategy. A common pathway out of poverty appears to have involved an intermediate step during which households accumulated assets and capital through farming, petty trading and migratory work. The applied approach of combining income and assets better distinguishes the identified livelihood strategies compared to both the income and the asset approach and allows targeting of interventions towards specific strategies and transition pathways.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Rural households are heterogeneous: different socio-economic characteristics and asset endowments dictate their engagement with different livelihood activities resulting in different livelihood outcomes. Poverty reduction policies should consider this. Using a unique environmentally augmented three-wave panel dataset from 427 households in three locations of Nepal, we proposed an approach that combines households' income and assets to identify different livelihood strategy clusters. Based on a Latent Markov Model we identify seven distinct livelihood strategies and analyse households' movements between strategies through time. Most sampled households changed their livelihood strategy at least once between 2006 and 2012, and very few households transited directly from the least to the most remunerative strategy. A common pathway out of poverty appears to have involved an intermediate step during which households accumulated assets and capital through farming, petty trading and migratory work. The applied approach of combining income and assets better distinguishes the identified livelihood strategies compared to both the income and the asset approach and allows targeting of interventions towards specific strategies and transition pathways.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Rural households are heterogeneous: different socio-economic characteristics and asset endowments dictate their engagement with different livelihood activities resulting in different livelihood outcomes. Poverty reduction policies should consider this. Using a unique environmentally augmented three-wave panel dataset from 427 households in three locations of Nepal, we proposed an approach that combines households' income and assets to identify different livelihood strategy clusters. Based on a Latent Markov Model we identify seven distinct livelihood strategies and analyse households' movements between strategies through time. Most sampled households changed their livelihood strategy at least once between 2006 and 2012, and very few households transited directly from the least to the most remunerative strategy. A common pathway out of poverty appears to have involved an intermediate step during which households accumulated assets and capital through farming, petty trading and migratory work. The applied approach of combining income and assets better distinguishes the identified livelihood strategies compared to both the income and the asset approach and allows targeting of interventions towards specific strategies and transition pathways.

Key concepts: Livelihood, Poverty, Asset (computer security), Capital asset, Poverty trap, Empirical evidence, Poverty reduction, Business

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A novel approach to dynamic livelihood clustering: Empirical evidence from Nepal — Research Paper | ScholarLens