2007•Unpublished venueRequires access

Unconscionability in Estoppel: Triable Issue or Foundational Principle?

KR Handley

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The role of unconscionability in estoppel by conduct is reviewed and analyzed. The requirements of good conscience are subsumed in the elements of each form of estoppel by conduct and unconscionability has no further useful role.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The role of unconscionability in estoppel by conduct is reviewed and analyzed. The requirements of good conscience are subsumed in the elements of each form of estoppel by conduct and unconscionability has no further useful role.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The role of unconscionability in estoppel by conduct is reviewed and analyzed. The requirements of good conscience are subsumed in the elements of each form of estoppel by conduct and unconscionability has no further useful role.

Key concepts: Unconscionability, Estoppel, Computer science, Political science, Law, Doctrine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Unconscionability in Estoppel: Triable Issue or Foundational Principle? — Research Paper | ScholarLens