2006•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Land Tenure, Land Use, and Sustainability in Kenya: Toward Innovative Use of Property Rights in Wildlife Management

Patricia Kameri‐Mbote

Open publisher page 25 citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The sustainable management of biological diversity is a major concern of the international community, which now realizes that this diversity is being eroded at an alarming rate due to consumptive uses of species as well as the excessive alteration of habitats through human activities such as cultivation, pastoralism, and urbanization. The increase in human population around the world also accelerates species extinction as such population exerts more pressure on available resources. Private property right regimes are believed to create incentives for the management of resources. They could, however, also encourage the erosion of the resources. In evaluating the role of property rights in wildlife management, it is imperative to examine critically the laws that have been put in place for the protection of biodiversity and the rights impacting on management activities. Our argument here is that private property rights and current wildlife conservation and management laws and policies in Kenya fail to provide the solution to wildlife biodiversity erosion partly because of their preoccupation with a monolithic system of property ownership favoring the state and individuals and neglecting communities and/or groups. BACKGROUND Kenya has great faunal and floral diversity, including forests, woodlands, swamps, and grasslands of many different varieties as well as 7,800 plant and animal species. Of all the varieties of plants, 25 percent are shrubs and trees, of which 5 percent are considered endangered while about 8 percent are rare.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

INTRODUCTION The sustainable management of biological diversity is a major concern of the international community, which now realizes that this diversity is being eroded at an alarming rate due to consumptive uses of species as well as the excessive alteration of habitats through human activities such as cultivation, pastoralism, and urbanization. The increase in human population around the world also accelerates species extinction as such population exerts more pressure on available resources. Private property right regimes are believed to create incentives for the management of resources. They could, however, also encourage the erosion of the resources. In evaluating the role of property rights in wildlife management, it is imperative to examine critically the laws that have been put in place for the protection of biodiversity and the rights impacting on management activities. Our argument here is that private property rights and current wildlife conservation and management laws and policies in Kenya fail to provide the solution to wildlife biodiversity erosion partly because of their preoccupation with a monolithic system of property ownership favoring the state and individuals and neglecting communities and/or groups. BACKGROUND Kenya has great faunal and floral diversity, including forests, woodlands, swamps, and grasslands of many different varieties as well as 7,800 plant and animal species. Of all the varieties of plants, 25 percent are shrubs and trees, of which 5 percent are considered endangered while about 8 percent are rare.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 25 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

INTRODUCTION The sustainable management of biological diversity is a major concern of the international community, which now realizes that this diversity is being eroded at an alarming rate due to consumptive uses of species as well as the excessive alteration of habitats through human activities such as cultivation, pastoralism, and urbanization. The increase in human population around the world also accelerates species extinction as such population exerts more pressure on available resources. Private property right regimes are believed to create incentives for the management of resources. They could, however, also encourage the erosion of the resources. In evaluating the role of property rights in wildlife management, it is imperative to examine critically the laws that have been put in place for the protection of biodiversity and the rights impacting on management activities. Our argument here is that private property rights and current wildlife conservation and management laws and policies in Kenya fail to provide the solution to wildlife biodiversity erosion partly because of their preoccupation with a monolithic system of property ownership favoring the state and individuals and neglecting communities and/or groups. BACKGROUND Kenya has great faunal and floral diversity, including forests, woodlands, swamps, and grasslands of many different varieties as well as 7,800 plant and animal species. Of all the varieties of plants, 25 percent are shrubs and trees, of which 5 percent are considered endangered while about 8 percent are rare.

Key concepts: Sustainability, Property rights, Wildlife, Land tenure, Business, Environmental planning, Wildlife management, Land use

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Land Tenure, Land Use, and Sustainability in Kenya: Toward Innovative Use of Property Rights in Wildlife Management — Research Paper | ScholarLens