GENETIC DIVERGENCE IN CHICKPEA (CICER ARIETINUM L.)
Arun Kumar, Ram Krishna, S. K. Chaturvedi
Abstract
Arun Kumar, Ram Krishna, S. K. Chaturvedi
Abstract
In order to assess the divergence among the 17 genotypes, 5 each developed through mutation breeding and intra-and interspecific hybridization and two standard checks in chickpea, Mahalanobis D2 statistics was applied. These genotypes were grouped into five clusters. Clusters II, I and III had 6, 5 and 4 genotypes, respectively. On the other hand, the clusters IV and V had only one genotype each. The genotypes falling in cluster III had the maximum divergence which were closely followed by those of clusters II and I. The maximum and minimum divergence was revealed between clusters II and V and between III and V, respectively. In general, the clusters II and V exhibited high and low mean values, respectively for most of the characters. It has been suggested that for varietal improvement the hybridization among the genotypes of divergent clusters should be done rather than depending on those genotypes of the cluster having minimum divergence.
OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In order to assess the divergence among the 17 genotypes, 5 each developed through mutation breeding and intra-and interspecific hybridization and two standard checks in chickpea, Mahalanobis D2 statistics was applied. These genotypes were grouped into five clusters. Clusters II, I and III had 6, 5 and 4 genotypes, respectively. On the other hand, the clusters IV and V had only one genotype each. The genotypes falling in cluster III had the maximum divergence which were closely followed by those of clusters II and I. The maximum and minimum divergence was revealed between clusters II and V and between III and V, respectively. In general, the clusters II and V exhibited high and low mean values, respectively for most of the characters. It has been suggested that for varietal improvement the hybridization among the genotypes of divergent clusters should be done rather than depending on those genotypes of the cluster having minimum divergence.
Key concepts: Genetic divergence, Mahalanobis distance, Divergence (linguistics), Genotype, Biology, Veterinary medicine, Cluster (spacecraft), Genetic diversity