12. The Problem of China in the Study of the History of Korean Science
Yung Sik Kim
Abstract
Yung Sik Kim
Abstract
Due to the Chinese origin of many ideas and artifacts of traditional Korean science, and the overwhelming Chinese influence on its development, the history of Korean science suffers from a kind of identity crisis, based on the issue of whether traditional Korean science should be considered simply a part of Chinese science. This chapter discusses the following questions: What roles and meanings should be assigned to such ideas and techniques in the history of Korean science? Would it be reasonable, or permissible, for a historian of Korean science to neglect them and to study only what is uniquely Korean? The Chinese dominance in East Asian science was absolute. Due to this absolute supremacy, the Chinese centrality was accepted by people living at the peripheries of the Chinese cultural world. This is best illustrated by the acceptance, among eighteenth-century Koreans, of the so-called theory of 'the Chinese origin of Western learning'.Keywords: China; Chinese origin of Western learning; Chinese science; culture; East Asian science; Korean Science
OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Due to the Chinese origin of many ideas and artifacts of traditional Korean science, and the overwhelming Chinese influence on its development, the history of Korean science suffers from a kind of identity crisis, based on the issue of whether traditional Korean science should be considered simply a part of Chinese science. This chapter discusses the following questions: What roles and meanings should be assigned to such ideas and techniques in the history of Korean science? Would it be reasonable, or permissible, for a historian of Korean science to neglect them and to study only what is uniquely Korean? The Chinese dominance in East Asian science was absolute. Due to this absolute supremacy, the Chinese centrality was accepted by people living at the peripheries of the Chinese cultural world. This is best illustrated by the acceptance, among eighteenth-century Koreans, of the so-called theory of 'the Chinese origin of Western learning'.Keywords: China; Chinese origin of Western learning; Chinese science; culture; East Asian science; Korean Science
Key concepts: China, History, Archaeology