2018Journal of Opioid ManagementRequires access

Midazolam as an antiemetic in patients receiving epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief

Mokhtar Elhakim, Hany Abd-Elfattah, Dalia Nasr El-Din, Reem Hamdy Elkabarity, Azia Atef, Atef El-Fakey

Open publisher page 10 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE: Epidural morphine has been associated with a significant incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The authors have evaluated the prophylactic effects of midazolam in preventing nausea and vomiting following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control. METHODS: The authors studied 80 women (n = 40 in each group) undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the surgery, all patients received epidural morphine 3 mg for postoperative pain. Before morphine injection, the midazolam group received low-dose midazolam infusion (1 mg bolus followed by 1 mg h(-1)), while the placebo group received i.v. saline. RESULTS: Patients in the midazolam group reported a lower incidence of total PONV, and a lower frequency of rescue antiemetic request than those in the placebo group (p < 0.05). In addition, midazolam was associated with a reduced incidence of pruritus following epidural morphine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that low-dose midazolam infusion is effective in the prevention of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

PURPOSE: Epidural morphine has been associated with a significant incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The authors have evaluated the prophylactic effects of midazolam in preventing nausea and vomiting following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control. METHODS: The authors studied 80 women (n = 40 in each group) undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the surgery, all patients received epidural morphine 3 mg for postoperative pain. Before morphine injection, the midazolam group received low-dose midazolam infusion (1 mg bolus followed by 1 mg h(-1)), while the placebo group received i.v. saline. RESULTS: Patients in the midazolam group reported a lower incidence of total PONV, and a lower frequency of rescue antiemetic request than those in the placebo group (p < 0.05). In addition, midazolam was associated with a reduced incidence of pruritus following epidural morphine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that low-dose midazolam infusion is effective in the prevention of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

PURPOSE: Epidural morphine has been associated with a significant incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The authors have evaluated the prophylactic effects of midazolam in preventing nausea and vomiting following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control. METHODS: The authors studied 80 women (n = 40 in each group) undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy under epidural anesthesia, in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. At the end of the surgery, all patients received epidural morphine 3 mg for postoperative pain. Before morphine injection, the midazolam group received low-dose midazolam infusion (1 mg bolus followed by 1 mg h(-1)), while the placebo group received i.v. saline. RESULTS: Patients in the midazolam group reported a lower incidence of total PONV, and a lower frequency of rescue antiemetic request than those in the placebo group (p < 0.05). In addition, midazolam was associated with a reduced incidence of pruritus following epidural morphine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The authors conclude that low-dose midazolam infusion is effective in the prevention of nausea, vomiting, and pruritus following epidural morphine for postoperative pain control.

Key concepts: Medicine, Midazolam, Anesthesia, Antiemetic, Nausea, Vomiting, Placebo, Morphine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Midazolam as an antiemetic in patients receiving epidural morphine for postoperative pain relief — Research Paper | ScholarLens