1998RePEc: Research Papers in EconomicsRequires access

Improved rolling schedules for the dynamic single level lot sizing problem

Hartmut Stadtler

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

A major argument for favoring simple lot-sizing heuristics-like the Silver/Meal or Groff's heuristic-to solve instances of the dynamic single-level uncapacitated lot-sizing problem SLLSP instead of exact algorithms-like those of Wagner/Whitin or Federgruen/Tzur-is that exact algorithms applied in a rolling horizon environment are heuristics too and may be outperformed by simple heuristics. This article shows how to modify the model of the SLLSP by looking beyond the planning horizon. Extensive tests within a rolling horizon environment have demonstrated that the modified model solved by an exact algorithm now performs at least as well as well-known heuristics and is fairly insensitive to the length of the planning horizon. Furthermore, our principal idea of improving rolling schedules by considering only a portion of the fixed cost related to a decision with an impact on periods beyond the planning horizon is applicable to a wide range of decision models.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A major argument for favoring simple lot-sizing heuristics-like the Silver/Meal or Groff's heuristic-to solve instances of the dynamic single-level uncapacitated lot-sizing problem SLLSP instead of exact algorithms-like those of Wagner/Whitin or Federgruen/Tzur-is that exact algorithms applied in a rolling horizon environment are heuristics too and may be outperformed by simple heuristics. This article shows how to modify the model of the SLLSP by looking beyond the planning horizon. Extensive tests within a rolling horizon environment have demonstrated that the modified model solved by an exact algorithm now performs at least as well as well-known heuristics and is fairly insensitive to the length of the planning horizon. Furthermore, our principal idea of improving rolling schedules by considering only a portion of the fixed cost related to a decision with an impact on periods beyond the planning horizon is applicable to a wide range of decision models.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A major argument for favoring simple lot-sizing heuristics-like the Silver/Meal or Groff's heuristic-to solve instances of the dynamic single-level uncapacitated lot-sizing problem SLLSP instead of exact algorithms-like those of Wagner/Whitin or Federgruen/Tzur-is that exact algorithms applied in a rolling horizon environment are heuristics too and may be outperformed by simple heuristics. This article shows how to modify the model of the SLLSP by looking beyond the planning horizon. Extensive tests within a rolling horizon environment have demonstrated that the modified model solved by an exact algorithm now performs at least as well as well-known heuristics and is fairly insensitive to the length of the planning horizon. Furthermore, our principal idea of improving rolling schedules by considering only a portion of the fixed cost related to a decision with an impact on periods beyond the planning horizon is applicable to a wide range of decision models.

Key concepts: Heuristics, Sizing, Time horizon, Mathematical optimization, Heuristic, Horizon, Simple (philosophy), Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Improved rolling schedules for the dynamic single level lot sizing problem — Research Paper | ScholarLens