1995•Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Modernist narratives and popular music

Charles Edward Hamm

Open publisher page 8 citations

Abstract

Popular music, as we understand the term today, was a product of the modern era, extending from the late eighteenth century through the first two-thirds of the twentieth, or from the industrial revolution through late capitalism. The modern era brought a concentration of power in the institutions of industrialized countries and a new set of economic and social relations within the developing systems of capitalism and socialism. It was a time of the emergence of large new nation-states, swallowing up previously autonomous city-states, regions, and smaller countries; of colonialism, with a handful of European countries taking military and economic control over much of the rest of the world, and then postcolonialism, with large international conglomerates playing the same role; and of oligarchical domination within industry, finance, and both state and private institutions. In contrast, today's postmodern world is marked by fragmentation, discontinuity, ephemerality, and chaos in economics, politics, social relations, and the arts. The intellectual and ideological climate of the modern era encouraged various writers to construct meta-narratives: broad, all-encompassing schemes purporting to yield some “special mode of representation of eternal truth.” Lyotard, who sees the modern-postmodern dialectic as a “crisis of narratives,” defines the modernist meta-narrative (in science): To the extent that science does not restrict itself to stating useful regularities and seeks the truth, it is obliged to legitimate the rules of its own game. It then produces a discourse of legitimation with respect to its own status, a discourse called philosophy. […]

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Popular music, as we understand the term today, was a product of the modern era, extending from the late eighteenth century through the first two-thirds of the twentieth, or from the industrial revolution through late capitalism. The modern era brought a concentration of power in the institutions of industrialized countries and a new set of economic and social relations within the developing systems of capitalism and socialism. It was a time of the emergence of large new nation-states, swallowing up previously autonomous city-states, regions, and smaller countries; of colonialism, with a handful of European countries taking military and economic control over much of the rest of the world, and then postcolonialism, with large international conglomerates playing the same role; and of oligarchical domination within industry, finance, and both state and private institutions. In contrast, today's postmodern world is marked by fragmentation, discontinuity, ephemerality, and chaos in economics, politics, social relations, and the arts. The intellectual and ideological climate of the modern era encouraged various writers to construct meta-narratives: broad, all-encompassing schemes purporting to yield some “special mode of representation of eternal truth.” Lyotard, who sees the modern-postmodern dialectic as a “crisis of narratives,” defines the modernist meta-narrative (in science): To the extent that science does not restrict itself to stating useful regularities and seeks the truth, it is obliged to legitimate the rules of its own game. It then produces a discourse of legitimation with respect to its own status, a discourse called philosophy. […]

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Popular music, as we understand the term today, was a product of the modern era, extending from the late eighteenth century through the first two-thirds of the twentieth, or from the industrial revolution through late capitalism. The modern era brought a concentration of power in the institutions of industrialized countries and a new set of economic and social relations within the developing systems of capitalism and socialism. It was a time of the emergence of large new nation-states, swallowing up previously autonomous city-states, regions, and smaller countries; of colonialism, with a handful of European countries taking military and economic control over much of the rest of the world, and then postcolonialism, with large international conglomerates playing the same role; and of oligarchical domination within industry, finance, and both state and private institutions. In contrast, today's postmodern world is marked by fragmentation, discontinuity, ephemerality, and chaos in economics, politics, social relations, and the arts. The intellectual and ideological climate of the modern era encouraged various writers to construct meta-narratives: broad, all-encompassing schemes purporting to yield some “special mode of representation of eternal truth.” Lyotard, who sees the modern-postmodern dialectic as a “crisis of narratives,” defines the modernist meta-narrative (in science): To the extent that science does not restrict itself to stating useful regularities and seeks the truth, it is obliged to legitimate the rules of its own game. It then produces a discourse of legitimation with respect to its own status, a discourse called philosophy. […]

Key concepts: Narrative, Art, Popular music, Literature, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modernist narratives and popular music — Research Paper | ScholarLens