The Role of the Use of US-guided Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy for the Total Removal of Sonographic Evidence in Low- and High-Risk Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions
Hyon‐Joo Kwag, Shin‐Ho Kook
Abstract
Hyon‐Joo Kwag, Shin‐Ho Kook
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the role of the use of a US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for the removal of sonographic evidence (excisional mammotome) for low- and high-risk benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the pathological results of 678 excisional mammotomes (611 low- and 46 high-risk benign and 21 malignant lesions). We compared the pathological results of the excisional mammotomes and the corresponding subsequent surgery of 27 high-risk benign (7/46 cases) and malignant (20/21 cases) lesions. We also reviewed the follow-up US findings of low- (306/611 cases) and high-risk benign lesions (33/39 cases). Results: Fifteen of 27 (55.6%) surgical cases revealed a residual lesion on the excisional mammotome. There was no case of upgrade pathology seen for a surgical specimen. Follow-up sonography of 306 low-risk benign lesions showed a negative finding for 231 (75.2%) cases, post-biopsy changes in 56 (17.8%) cases, and residual lesions in 19 (5.7%) cases. None of the lesion was palpable. Follow-up sonography of 33 high-risk benign lesions revealed a negative finding in 28 (85%) cases, a post-biopsy scar in 4 (12%) cases, and a local recurrence in 1 (3%) case; none of the cases showed a residual lesion. Conclusion: We suggest that an excisional mammotome can replace surgical excision for low-risk cases and may avoid the immediate surgery for high-risk benign lesions; however, surgery is crucial for a malignancy.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Purpose: To determine the role of the use of a US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy for the removal of sonographic evidence (excisional mammotome) for low- and high-risk benign and malignant breast lesions. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the pathological results of 678 excisional mammotomes (611 low- and 46 high-risk benign and 21 malignant lesions). We compared the pathological results of the excisional mammotomes and the corresponding subsequent surgery of 27 high-risk benign (7/46 cases) and malignant (20/21 cases) lesions. We also reviewed the follow-up US findings of low- (306/611 cases) and high-risk benign lesions (33/39 cases). Results: Fifteen of 27 (55.6%) surgical cases revealed a residual lesion on the excisional mammotome. There was no case of upgrade pathology seen for a surgical specimen. Follow-up sonography of 306 low-risk benign lesions showed a negative finding for 231 (75.2%) cases, post-biopsy changes in 56 (17.8%) cases, and residual lesions in 19 (5.7%) cases. None of the lesion was palpable. Follow-up sonography of 33 high-risk benign lesions revealed a negative finding in 28 (85%) cases, a post-biopsy scar in 4 (12%) cases, and a local recurrence in 1 (3%) case; none of the cases showed a residual lesion. Conclusion: We suggest that an excisional mammotome can replace surgical excision for low-risk cases and may avoid the immediate surgery for high-risk benign lesions; however, surgery is crucial for a malignancy.
Key concepts: Mammotome, Medicine, Biopsy, Malignancy, Radiology, Lesion, Pathological, Breast biopsy