2000•Unpublished venueRequires access

[Comparative analysis of five application programs of organic bioestimulants [Crop plus, Kelpak, Profert, Aminobox 8N, Aminobox 8K, Naturbox, Bioplus Extra, Auxym, Retsul, Spimplex] on the quality of table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivars Thompson Seedless and Flame Seedless]

Muriel Andrea Gana S, Carolina Andrea Ramirez V

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Vitis vinifera, Table grape, Crop, Table (database), Horticulture, Agronomy, Biology, Computer science

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

[Comparative analysis of five application programs of organic bioestimulants [Crop plus, Kelpak, Profert, Aminobox 8N, Aminobox 8K, Naturbox, Bioplus Extra, Auxym, Retsul, Spimplex] on the quality of table grapes (Vitis vinifera L.), cultivars Thompson Seedless and Flame Seedless] — Research Paper | ScholarLens