Evaluation of Acaricides for their Safety to the Predatory Mites
S.N. Darandale, S.E. Gaikwad
Abstract
S.N. Darandale, S.E. Gaikwad
Abstract
Field studies were undertaken on brinjal crop during summer to evaluate bioefficacy of four newer selective acaricides and NSKE, as a botanical pesticide against the red spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisd) and simultaneously to study their safety to field prevailing predatory mites; In respect of the safety to field prevailing predatory mites, dicofol and NSKE were noticed to be harmful and harmless, respectively. Spiromesifen and abamectin were observed to be relatively safe, while bifenazate and fenazaquin were moderately safe. The studies indicated that spiromesifen and abamectin were more suitable and ecofriendly for the management of the target mite.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Field studies were undertaken on brinjal crop during summer to evaluate bioefficacy of four newer selective acaricides and NSKE, as a botanical pesticide against the red spider mite, Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisd) and simultaneously to study their safety to field prevailing predatory mites; In respect of the safety to field prevailing predatory mites, dicofol and NSKE were noticed to be harmful and harmless, respectively. Spiromesifen and abamectin were observed to be relatively safe, while bifenazate and fenazaquin were moderately safe. The studies indicated that spiromesifen and abamectin were more suitable and ecofriendly for the management of the target mite.
Key concepts: Dicofol, Acaricide, Abamectin, Toxicology, Spider mite, Amitraz, Mite, Spider