2011Progressive HorticultureRequires access

Economic evaluation of subsurface drip irrigation system in tomato

Rakesh Sharda, M. P. Kaushal, Mukesh Siag, Nilesh Biwalkar

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted for the year 2005 and 2006 to study the effect of subsurface drip irrigation and fertigation on yield, water use efficiency and quality parameters of the tomato crop. The results revealed that crop under irrigation level of 0.9 PET (I2) gave significantly more yield in comparison to 0.6 PET (I2). The water use efficiency at I1 level was found maximum. The crop received 100 per cent of recommended fertilizer F100 gave more yield in comparison to when supplied with 50 per cent of recommend fertilizer F50. The crop irrigated with lateral buried at 25 cm (D3) registered average tomato yield of 50.5 t/ha in 2005 and 49.7 t/ha in 2006, respectively and found to be much superior as compared to surface placed drip lateral (D-1). The highest yield was recorded with I1F100D3 level during both the years of study. The gross income of subsurface drip irrigation and surface drip irrigation was Rs. 164,400/ha and 149125/ha, respectively. Higher benefit cost ratio in the case of subsurface drip irrigation system (2.14:1) as compared to surface drip irrigation (1.81: 1) suggests better returns from the subsurface drip irrigation system.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A field experiment was conducted for the year 2005 and 2006 to study the effect of subsurface drip irrigation and fertigation on yield, water use efficiency and quality parameters of the tomato crop. The results revealed that crop under irrigation level of 0.9 PET (I2) gave significantly more yield in comparison to 0.6 PET (I2). The water use efficiency at I1 level was found maximum. The crop received 100 per cent of recommended fertilizer F100 gave more yield in comparison to when supplied with 50 per cent of recommend fertilizer F50. The crop irrigated with lateral buried at 25 cm (D3) registered average tomato yield of 50.5 t/ha in 2005 and 49.7 t/ha in 2006, respectively and found to be much superior as compared to surface placed drip lateral (D-1). The highest yield was recorded with I1F100D3 level during both the years of study. The gross income of subsurface drip irrigation and surface drip irrigation was Rs. 164,400/ha and 149125/ha, respectively. Higher benefit cost ratio in the case of subsurface drip irrigation system (2.14:1) as compared to surface drip irrigation (1.81: 1) suggests better returns from the subsurface drip irrigation system.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A field experiment was conducted for the year 2005 and 2006 to study the effect of subsurface drip irrigation and fertigation on yield, water use efficiency and quality parameters of the tomato crop. The results revealed that crop under irrigation level of 0.9 PET (I2) gave significantly more yield in comparison to 0.6 PET (I2). The water use efficiency at I1 level was found maximum. The crop received 100 per cent of recommended fertilizer F100 gave more yield in comparison to when supplied with 50 per cent of recommend fertilizer F50. The crop irrigated with lateral buried at 25 cm (D3) registered average tomato yield of 50.5 t/ha in 2005 and 49.7 t/ha in 2006, respectively and found to be much superior as compared to surface placed drip lateral (D-1). The highest yield was recorded with I1F100D3 level during both the years of study. The gross income of subsurface drip irrigation and surface drip irrigation was Rs. 164,400/ha and 149125/ha, respectively. Higher benefit cost ratio in the case of subsurface drip irrigation system (2.14:1) as compared to surface drip irrigation (1.81: 1) suggests better returns from the subsurface drip irrigation system.

Key concepts: Drip irrigation, Fertigation, Irrigation, Yield (engineering), Surface irrigation, Fertilizer, Low-flow irrigation systems, Crop

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Economic evaluation of subsurface drip irrigation system in tomato — Research Paper | ScholarLens