2013•SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Ethics of Evil? Of Genocide in Rwanda and Incursion of Religious Language

Jean-Pierre Karegeye

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

Among the factors that make a genocide or genocide denial both possible and banal, scholars often cite the dehumanization of the victim perceived as an insect or harmful animal. Beyond notions of banality and spontaneity, it is essential that we reflect on mass crime using moral or religious categories. Once we think of it in this way, genocide proceeds from a logic that defines good and evil and thus allows killing without committing a crime. Preventing genocide and fighting against denial will also consist of deconstructing the rationalities that welcomed and justified the genocide and allow denial today.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Among the factors that make a genocide or genocide denial both possible and banal, scholars often cite the dehumanization of the victim perceived as an insect or harmful animal. Beyond notions of banality and spontaneity, it is essential that we reflect on mass crime using moral or religious categories. Once we think of it in this way, genocide proceeds from a logic that defines good and evil and thus allows killing without committing a crime. Preventing genocide and fighting against denial will also consist of deconstructing the rationalities that welcomed and justified the genocide and allow denial today.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Among the factors that make a genocide or genocide denial both possible and banal, scholars often cite the dehumanization of the victim perceived as an insect or harmful animal. Beyond notions of banality and spontaneity, it is essential that we reflect on mass crime using moral or religious categories. Once we think of it in this way, genocide proceeds from a logic that defines good and evil and thus allows killing without committing a crime. Preventing genocide and fighting against denial will also consist of deconstructing the rationalities that welcomed and justified the genocide and allow denial today.

Key concepts: Genocide, Denial, Dehumanization, Criminology, Sociology, Political science, Law, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Ethics of Evil? Of Genocide in Rwanda and Incursion of Religious Language — Research Paper | ScholarLens