2001•PubMedRequires access

[Lumbar lateral recess stenosis. Clinical symptoms, diagnostic modalities and surgical management].

Bertold Andreas Wörner, M. Lange, U Fink, R. Oeckler

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of its importance for lumbar radicular syndroms only a few reports about lumbar lateral recess stenosis exist in literature. Most important clinical symptom is radicular pain, which may be exercise-dependent. Confirmation of diagnosis and differentiation from disc herniation requires imaging like CT, MRI or post-myelo-CT. Surgical treatment options include selective decompression techniques like foraminotomy, medial facettectomy and undercutting as well as hemilaminectomy, laminotomy and wide laminectomy or fusion. METHOD: We treated 35 patients with selective decompression techniques. RESULTS: In the follow-up 5 up to 18 months after surgery 25 patients for themselves described the results as good or excellent. Therefore, individually tailored selective microsurgical decompression is an appropriate and successful treatment strategy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis, if conservative treatment fails.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: In spite of its importance for lumbar radicular syndroms only a few reports about lumbar lateral recess stenosis exist in literature. Most important clinical symptom is radicular pain, which may be exercise-dependent. Confirmation of diagnosis and differentiation from disc herniation requires imaging like CT, MRI or post-myelo-CT. Surgical treatment options include selective decompression techniques like foraminotomy, medial facettectomy and undercutting as well as hemilaminectomy, laminotomy and wide laminectomy or fusion. METHOD: We treated 35 patients with selective decompression techniques. RESULTS: In the follow-up 5 up to 18 months after surgery 25 patients for themselves described the results as good or excellent. Therefore, individually tailored selective microsurgical decompression is an appropriate and successful treatment strategy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis, if conservative treatment fails.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: In spite of its importance for lumbar radicular syndroms only a few reports about lumbar lateral recess stenosis exist in literature. Most important clinical symptom is radicular pain, which may be exercise-dependent. Confirmation of diagnosis and differentiation from disc herniation requires imaging like CT, MRI or post-myelo-CT. Surgical treatment options include selective decompression techniques like foraminotomy, medial facettectomy and undercutting as well as hemilaminectomy, laminotomy and wide laminectomy or fusion. METHOD: We treated 35 patients with selective decompression techniques. RESULTS: In the follow-up 5 up to 18 months after surgery 25 patients for themselves described the results as good or excellent. Therefore, individually tailored selective microsurgical decompression is an appropriate and successful treatment strategy for lumbar lateral recess stenosis, if conservative treatment fails.

Key concepts: Foraminotomy, Laminotomy, Medicine, Lateral recess, Decompression, Laminectomy, Surgery, Radicular pain

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Lumbar lateral recess stenosis. Clinical symptoms, diagnostic modalities and surgical management]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens