1976PubMedRequires access

Tubal sterilization--review of methods.

J Wortman

Open publisher page 28 citations

Abstract

Methods available for female tubal sterilization are reviewed. The development of endoscopic equipment and special cannulae has permitted a variety of approaches to female sterilization. Laparotomy which requires a large abdominal incision has been replaced by minilaparotomy (small abdominal incision) laparoscopy (abdominal puncture) colpotomy and culdoscopy (vaginal approach) or hysteroscopy (transcervical approach). Procedures reviewed involving tubal ligation include simple ligation the Madlener technique the Irving technique the Wood technique salpingectomy the Pomeroy technique fimbriectomy cornual resection and the Uchida technique. Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic fulguration tubal occlusion with tantalum clips spring-loaded clips plastic clips and the falope ring plugs chemical tubal occlusion (quinacrine silver nitrate silastic methyl 1-2-cyanoacrylate gelatin-resorcinol-formalde hyde) and experimental methods such as fimbriectomy and carbon dioxide laser are reviewed and their advantages and disadvantages are outlined. Endoscopic techniques generally require more skill and training than other techniques while transcervical approaches are considered to be in the experimental stage. Electrocautery and some chemical methods are more likely to damage structures adjacent to the tubes than other methods. Infection occurs more frequently with vaginal methods than abdominal methods. Morbidity is more frequently associated with ligation techniques than those in which the continuity of the tube is maintained. Anastomosis is most successful in cases of tubal ligation though a full assessment of plugs in this respect has not been done.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Methods available for female tubal sterilization are reviewed. The development of endoscopic equipment and special cannulae has permitted a variety of approaches to female sterilization. Laparotomy which requires a large abdominal incision has been replaced by minilaparotomy (small abdominal incision) laparoscopy (abdominal puncture) colpotomy and culdoscopy (vaginal approach) or hysteroscopy (transcervical approach). Procedures reviewed involving tubal ligation include simple ligation the Madlener technique the Irving technique the Wood technique salpingectomy the Pomeroy technique fimbriectomy cornual resection and the Uchida technique. Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic fulguration tubal occlusion with tantalum clips spring-loaded clips plastic clips and the falope ring plugs chemical tubal occlusion (quinacrine silver nitrate silastic methyl 1-2-cyanoacrylate gelatin-resorcinol-formalde hyde) and experimental methods such as fimbriectomy and carbon dioxide laser are reviewed and their advantages and disadvantages are outlined. Endoscopic techniques generally require more skill and training than other techniques while transcervical approaches are considered to be in the experimental stage. Electrocautery and some chemical methods are more likely to damage structures adjacent to the tubes than other methods. Infection occurs more frequently with vaginal methods than abdominal methods. Morbidity is more frequently associated with ligation techniques than those in which the continuity of the tube is maintained. Anastomosis is most successful in cases of tubal ligation though a full assessment of plugs in this respect has not been done.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 28 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Methods available for female tubal sterilization are reviewed. The development of endoscopic equipment and special cannulae has permitted a variety of approaches to female sterilization. Laparotomy which requires a large abdominal incision has been replaced by minilaparotomy (small abdominal incision) laparoscopy (abdominal puncture) colpotomy and culdoscopy (vaginal approach) or hysteroscopy (transcervical approach). Procedures reviewed involving tubal ligation include simple ligation the Madlener technique the Irving technique the Wood technique salpingectomy the Pomeroy technique fimbriectomy cornual resection and the Uchida technique. Laparoscopic and hysteroscopic fulguration tubal occlusion with tantalum clips spring-loaded clips plastic clips and the falope ring plugs chemical tubal occlusion (quinacrine silver nitrate silastic methyl 1-2-cyanoacrylate gelatin-resorcinol-formalde hyde) and experimental methods such as fimbriectomy and carbon dioxide laser are reviewed and their advantages and disadvantages are outlined. Endoscopic techniques generally require more skill and training than other techniques while transcervical approaches are considered to be in the experimental stage. Electrocautery and some chemical methods are more likely to damage structures adjacent to the tubes than other methods. Infection occurs more frequently with vaginal methods than abdominal methods. Morbidity is more frequently associated with ligation techniques than those in which the continuity of the tube is maintained. Anastomosis is most successful in cases of tubal ligation though a full assessment of plugs in this respect has not been done.

Key concepts: CLIPS, Tubal ligation, Surgery, Medicine, Laparotomy, Laparoscopy, Fulguration, Sterilization (economics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tubal sterilization--review of methods. — Research Paper | ScholarLens