2013Edward Elgar Publishing eBooksRequires access

From Austria to Australia: Mark Blaug and cultural economics

Christian Handke, Erwin Dekker

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

This chapter discusses the legacy of Mark Blaug for cultural economics. It revolves around two basic questions: first, what is the scope and purpose of cultural economics according to Mark Blaug? Second, what do we learn about Mark Blaug’s take on applied economics from his contributions to this field? The first question is of particular interest because Mark Blaug played a formative role in the economics of the arts and culture. He pioneered what he called the ‘economics of the arts’ in the 1970s, and he kept contributing to what came to be called ‘cultural economics’ ever since. Over more than four decades, he played an important role in establishing cultural economics as a recognized discipline in applied economics – even though he was not too fond of this term himself. A noteworthy constant in Mark Blaug’s writing is that it reflects a genuine interest in what many others have written. Similar to his work on the history of economic thought or the economics of education, for example, he kept taking stock of the literature on cultural economics, pointing out achievements, gaps and desirable extensions, which provide a useful point of orientation and inspiration for anyone concerned with cultural economics. Regarding the second question, Mark Blaug is of course much better known for his work on the history of economic thought and economic methodology. Yet, his publications on the economics of art and culture illustrate how Mark Blaug practised what he preached.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This chapter discusses the legacy of Mark Blaug for cultural economics. It revolves around two basic questions: first, what is the scope and purpose of cultural economics according to Mark Blaug? Second, what do we learn about Mark Blaug’s take on applied economics from his contributions to this field? The first question is of particular interest because Mark Blaug played a formative role in the economics of the arts and culture. He pioneered what he called the ‘economics of the arts’ in the 1970s, and he kept contributing to what came to be called ‘cultural economics’ ever since. Over more than four decades, he played an important role in establishing cultural economics as a recognized discipline in applied economics – even though he was not too fond of this term himself. A noteworthy constant in Mark Blaug’s writing is that it reflects a genuine interest in what many others have written. Similar to his work on the history of economic thought or the economics of education, for example, he kept taking stock of the literature on cultural economics, pointing out achievements, gaps and desirable extensions, which provide a useful point of orientation and inspiration for anyone concerned with cultural economics. Regarding the second question, Mark Blaug is of course much better known for his work on the history of economic thought and economic methodology. Yet, his publications on the economics of art and culture illustrate how Mark Blaug practised what he preached.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This chapter discusses the legacy of Mark Blaug for cultural economics. It revolves around two basic questions: first, what is the scope and purpose of cultural economics according to Mark Blaug? Second, what do we learn about Mark Blaug’s take on applied economics from his contributions to this field? The first question is of particular interest because Mark Blaug played a formative role in the economics of the arts and culture. He pioneered what he called the ‘economics of the arts’ in the 1970s, and he kept contributing to what came to be called ‘cultural economics’ ever since. Over more than four decades, he played an important role in establishing cultural economics as a recognized discipline in applied economics – even though he was not too fond of this term himself. A noteworthy constant in Mark Blaug’s writing is that it reflects a genuine interest in what many others have written. Similar to his work on the history of economic thought or the economics of education, for example, he kept taking stock of the literature on cultural economics, pointing out achievements, gaps and desirable extensions, which provide a useful point of orientation and inspiration for anyone concerned with cultural economics. Regarding the second question, Mark Blaug is of course much better known for his work on the history of economic thought and economic methodology. Yet, his publications on the economics of art and culture illustrate how Mark Blaug practised what he preached.

Key concepts: Cultural economics, Economics education, The arts, Positive economics, History of economic thought, Formative assessment, Social science, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From Austria to Australia: Mark Blaug and cultural economics — Research Paper | ScholarLens