Problems and new approaches in the use of serology for seed-borne bacteria
A.A. Franken, Jim W. L. Van Vuurde
Abstract
A.A. Franken, Jim W. L. Van Vuurde
Abstract
(...) A disadvantage of the commonly used serological techniques in seed testing, e.g. immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is the lack of distinction between viable and dormant or dead cells. This often results in a «grey» area of discrepancy between results of serological and traditional isolation assays. New techniques such as immunofluorescence colony staining, direct double diffusion in dilution plates, immunosorbent immunofluorescence and immuno-isolation combine isolation and serological techniques and have the potential to overcome this «grey» area
OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
(...) A disadvantage of the commonly used serological techniques in seed testing, e.g. immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is the lack of distinction between viable and dormant or dead cells. This often results in a «grey» area of discrepancy between results of serological and traditional isolation assays. New techniques such as immunofluorescence colony staining, direct double diffusion in dilution plates, immunosorbent immunofluorescence and immuno-isolation combine isolation and serological techniques and have the potential to overcome this «grey» area
Key concepts: Serology, Immunofluorescence, Biology, Indirect immunofluorescence, Isolation (microbiology), Staining, Microbiology, Antibody