1990•Seed Science and TechnologyRequires access

Problems and new approaches in the use of serology for seed-borne bacteria

A.A. Franken, Jim W. L. Van Vuurde

Open publisher page 14 citations

Abstract

(...) A disadvantage of the commonly used serological techniques in seed testing, e.g. immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is the lack of distinction between viable and dormant or dead cells. This often results in a «grey» area of discrepancy between results of serological and traditional isolation assays. New techniques such as immunofluorescence colony staining, direct double diffusion in dilution plates, immunosorbent immunofluorescence and immuno-isolation combine isolation and serological techniques and have the potential to overcome this «grey» area

About this research paper

What this paper is about

(...) A disadvantage of the commonly used serological techniques in seed testing, e.g. immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is the lack of distinction between viable and dormant or dead cells. This often results in a «grey» area of discrepancy between results of serological and traditional isolation assays. New techniques such as immunofluorescence colony staining, direct double diffusion in dilution plates, immunosorbent immunofluorescence and immuno-isolation combine isolation and serological techniques and have the potential to overcome this «grey» area

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 14 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

(...) A disadvantage of the commonly used serological techniques in seed testing, e.g. immunofluorescence microscopy (IF) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), is the lack of distinction between viable and dormant or dead cells. This often results in a «grey» area of discrepancy between results of serological and traditional isolation assays. New techniques such as immunofluorescence colony staining, direct double diffusion in dilution plates, immunosorbent immunofluorescence and immuno-isolation combine isolation and serological techniques and have the potential to overcome this «grey» area

Key concepts: Serology, Immunofluorescence, Biology, Indirect immunofluorescence, Isolation (microbiology), Staining, Microbiology, Antibody

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Problems and new approaches in the use of serology for seed-borne bacteria — Research Paper | ScholarLens