2010The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong)Requires access

From "Writing History for the Former Dynasty" to "Fostering Confucian Principles and Virtues": Early-Qing Writings on Southern Ming History

WM Chan

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The first decades of the Qing dynasty witnessed prolific development \nof historical writings on Southern Ming history. The comparatively relaxed \natmosphere provided a platform for literati with diverse political stances to \nvoice their views on the historical events that concerned them. \nEmphasizing the use of history in statecraft, many Chinese historians \nconsidered the history of the Ming fall and Qing rise to offer a valuable \nlesson for rulers in the future. In the social construction of the early Qing \ndiscourse on the resistance history of 1644-1662, the narratives by \nhistorians from different social groups became a tool in the struggle for \ncultural dominance and hegemony. To the remnant Ming loyalists, the \nMing yimin, their remembering and appreciation of the late Ming martyrs, \nto a large extent, were an expression of their anti-Qing sentiment and \ndetermination to live as yimin. However, to the Han Chinese in the new \ngovernment, the history of the Ming-Qing dynastic change merely \nindicated a shift of Heaven’s Will. Influenced by the yimin scholars, many \nHan Chinese in the early Qing were ambivalent about accepting the legitimacy of Qing rule and considered the Southern Ming a legitimate \ndynasty in Chinese history. This ambivalence in time led to a less \npoliticized interpretation of the resistance history that regarded the deeds of \nthe Ming loyalists as an embodiment of Confucian principles and virtues. \nAs a result of reconciliation, the new interpretation in the end became a \ncollective memory of the history of the Ming-Qing transition among the \nQing’s subjects.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The first decades of the Qing dynasty witnessed prolific development \nof historical writings on Southern Ming history. The comparatively relaxed \natmosphere provided a platform for literati with diverse political stances to \nvoice their views on the historical events that concerned them. \nEmphasizing the use of history in statecraft, many Chinese historians \nconsidered the history of the Ming fall and Qing rise to offer a valuable \nlesson for rulers in the future. In the social construction of the early Qing \ndiscourse on the resistance history of 1644-1662, the narratives by \nhistorians from different social groups became a tool in the struggle for \ncultural dominance and hegemony. To the remnant Ming loyalists, the \nMing yimin, their remembering and appreciation of the late Ming martyrs, \nto a large extent, were an expression of their anti-Qing sentiment and \ndetermination to live as yimin. However, to the Han Chinese in the new \ngovernment, the history of the Ming-Qing dynastic change merely \nindicated a shift of Heaven’s Will. Influenced by the yimin scholars, many \nHan Chinese in the early Qing were ambivalent about accepting the legitimacy of Qing rule and considered the Southern Ming a legitimate \ndynasty in Chinese history. This ambivalence in time led to a less \npoliticized interpretation of the resistance history that regarded the deeds of \nthe Ming loyalists as an embodiment of Confucian principles and virtues. \nAs a result of reconciliation, the new interpretation in the end became a \ncollective memory of the history of the Ming-Qing transition among the \nQing’s subjects.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The first decades of the Qing dynasty witnessed prolific development \nof historical writings on Southern Ming history. The comparatively relaxed \natmosphere provided a platform for literati with diverse political stances to \nvoice their views on the historical events that concerned them. \nEmphasizing the use of history in statecraft, many Chinese historians \nconsidered the history of the Ming fall and Qing rise to offer a valuable \nlesson for rulers in the future. In the social construction of the early Qing \ndiscourse on the resistance history of 1644-1662, the narratives by \nhistorians from different social groups became a tool in the struggle for \ncultural dominance and hegemony. To the remnant Ming loyalists, the \nMing yimin, their remembering and appreciation of the late Ming martyrs, \nto a large extent, were an expression of their anti-Qing sentiment and \ndetermination to live as yimin. However, to the Han Chinese in the new \ngovernment, the history of the Ming-Qing dynastic change merely \nindicated a shift of Heaven’s Will. Influenced by the yimin scholars, many \nHan Chinese in the early Qing were ambivalent about accepting the legitimacy of Qing rule and considered the Southern Ming a legitimate \ndynasty in Chinese history. This ambivalence in time led to a less \npoliticized interpretation of the resistance history that regarded the deeds of \nthe Ming loyalists as an embodiment of Confucian principles and virtues. \nAs a result of reconciliation, the new interpretation in the end became a \ncollective memory of the history of the Ming-Qing transition among the \nQing’s subjects.

Key concepts: History, Ancient history, Aesthetics, Literature, Philosophy, Art

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
From "Writing History for the Former Dynasty" to "Fostering Confucian Principles and Virtues": Early-Qing Writings on Southern Ming History — Research Paper | ScholarLens