1976Unpublished venueOpen access

Studies on Disinfection and Chemical Oxidation with Ozone and Chlorine in Water Reclamation

W. R. Ross, Johannes van Leeuwen, W. O. K. Grabow

Open full text 6 citations

Abstract

Laboratory studies showed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas hydrophila and Acinetobacter anitratum are more resistant to chlorine and ozone than Escherichia coli. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most resistant of all strains tested and was selected as test organism for pilot plant studies on the efficiencies of chlorine and ozone disinfection. The disinfectants proved equally efficient for the disinfection of chlorine demand-free water but ozone was much more efficient in the case of water with a chlorine demand. This difference was confirmed to be due to the property of chlorine to react with nitrogenous substances to form chloramines which are less efficient disinfectants than chlorine. Ozone does not share this property. Laboratory studies showed that ozone was highly efficient in the chemical oxidation of the pesticides parathion, fenthion, lindane and dieldrin and the detergents Manoxol OT and LAS. These compounds are not oxidized under conventional conditions of chlorination. Consid-eration of the above findings and other advantages and disad-vantages of chlorine and ozone accentuate the value of using appropriate combinations of disinfectants for the treatment of certain waters. A final treatment sequence of ozonation, acti-vated carbon filtration and chlorination may improve costs and efficiency of water reclamation.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Laboratory studies showed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas hydrophila and Acinetobacter anitratum are more resistant to chlorine and ozone than Escherichia coli. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most resistant of all strains tested and was selected as test organism for pilot plant studies on the efficiencies of chlorine and ozone disinfection. The disinfectants proved equally efficient for the disinfection of chlorine demand-free water but ozone was much more efficient in the case of water with a chlorine demand. This difference was confirmed to be due to the property of chlorine to react with nitrogenous substances to form chloramines which are less efficient disinfectants than chlorine. Ozone does not share this property. Laboratory studies showed that ozone was highly efficient in the chemical oxidation of the pesticides parathion, fenthion, lindane and dieldrin and the detergents Manoxol OT and LAS. These compounds are not oxidized under conventional conditions of chlorination. Consid-eration of the above findings and other advantages and disad-vantages of chlorine and ozone accentuate the value of using appropriate combinations of disinfectants for the treatment of certain waters. A final treatment sequence of ozonation, acti-vated carbon filtration and chlorination may improve costs and efficiency of water reclamation.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Laboratory studies showed that Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas hydrophila and Acinetobacter anitratum are more resistant to chlorine and ozone than Escherichia coli. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most resistant of all strains tested and was selected as test organism for pilot plant studies on the efficiencies of chlorine and ozone disinfection. The disinfectants proved equally efficient for the disinfection of chlorine demand-free water but ozone was much more efficient in the case of water with a chlorine demand. This difference was confirmed to be due to the property of chlorine to react with nitrogenous substances to form chloramines which are less efficient disinfectants than chlorine. Ozone does not share this property. Laboratory studies showed that ozone was highly efficient in the chemical oxidation of the pesticides parathion, fenthion, lindane and dieldrin and the detergents Manoxol OT and LAS. These compounds are not oxidized under conventional conditions of chlorination. Consid-eration of the above findings and other advantages and disad-vantages of chlorine and ozone accentuate the value of using appropriate combinations of disinfectants for the treatment of certain waters. A final treatment sequence of ozonation, acti-vated carbon filtration and chlorination may improve costs and efficiency of water reclamation.

Key concepts: Chlorine, Ozone, Chloramine, Chemistry, Disinfectant, Environmental chemistry, Water treatment, Environmental engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Studies on Disinfection and Chemical Oxidation with Ozone and Chlorine in Water Reclamation — Research Paper | ScholarLens