2004•International Criminal Justice ReviewRequires access

Evaluating The Seriousness of Police Misconduct

Sanja Kutnjak Ivković

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

This article examines citizen and police evaluations of the seriousness of police misconduct. It uses a questionnaire with 10 scenarios describing police corruption and one scenario describing the use of excessive force. The respondents—police officers and college students in the United States and Croatia—were asked to evaluate the seriousness of these scenarios. The results suggest that, although absolute evaluations of seriousness differ, their relative rankings match closely across the two types of respondents (police officers and students) and across the two societies (the U.S. and Croatia). These results expand on previous findings of a shared hierarchy of crime seriousness by showing that the perceptions of the seriousness of police misconduct are shared across cultures, thus transcending national boundaries and suggesting a common understanding of crime seriousness.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines citizen and police evaluations of the seriousness of police misconduct. It uses a questionnaire with 10 scenarios describing police corruption and one scenario describing the use of excessive force. The respondents—police officers and college students in the United States and Croatia—were asked to evaluate the seriousness of these scenarios. The results suggest that, although absolute evaluations of seriousness differ, their relative rankings match closely across the two types of respondents (police officers and students) and across the two societies (the U.S. and Croatia). These results expand on previous findings of a shared hierarchy of crime seriousness by showing that the perceptions of the seriousness of police misconduct are shared across cultures, thus transcending national boundaries and suggesting a common understanding of crime seriousness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines citizen and police evaluations of the seriousness of police misconduct. It uses a questionnaire with 10 scenarios describing police corruption and one scenario describing the use of excessive force. The respondents—police officers and college students in the United States and Croatia—were asked to evaluate the seriousness of these scenarios. The results suggest that, although absolute evaluations of seriousness differ, their relative rankings match closely across the two types of respondents (police officers and students) and across the two societies (the U.S. and Croatia). These results expand on previous findings of a shared hierarchy of crime seriousness by showing that the perceptions of the seriousness of police misconduct are shared across cultures, thus transcending national boundaries and suggesting a common understanding of crime seriousness.

Key concepts: Seriousness, Misconduct, Hierarchy, Psychology, Criminology, Social psychology, Political science, Law

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluating The Seriousness of Police Misconduct — Research Paper | ScholarLens