1998American Journal of Clinical PathologyRequires access

Tissue Heterogeneity of Immunohistochemically Detected Estrogen Receptor: Implications for Image Analysis Quantification

Lester J. Layfield, Elizabeth A. Saria, Eoghan E. Mooney, Katharin Liu, Richard R. Dodge

Open publisher page 39 citations

Abstract

The increasingly popular immunohistochemical techniques for assay of the estrogen receptor (ER) allow localization of receptor positivity to specific cell populations. Heterogeneity of the ER in tumor cell populations may have important implications for analytic cell selection and for prognosis in ER-positive carcinomas. We studied 84 tissue blocks for level-to-level and geographic heterogeneity within level of the ER and cytokeratin by staining alternate serial sections for ER and cytokeratin. Distribution of ER and cytokeratin positivity was manually assessed. Homogenous positive staining was seen in 63 of 84 cases for ER and 71 of 84 cases for cytokeratin. Distinct geographic variability constant from level to level was seen in 7 cases for ER. In each of these cases, the cell populations stained uniformly for cytokeratin. Artifactual heterogeneity seemed to be uncommon for ER. Automated image analysis and manual ER estimation resulted in more positive cases than did the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) technique. Interobserver correlation for the manual method seemed high, as did correlation between the manual method and image analysis. Because a majority of the immunohistochemical staining heterogeneity for ER seemed to be biologic, we believe it may mark carcinomas that are less responsive to tamoxifen and more likely to progress than would be predicted by more traditional methods of ER analysis.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The increasingly popular immunohistochemical techniques for assay of the estrogen receptor (ER) allow localization of receptor positivity to specific cell populations. Heterogeneity of the ER in tumor cell populations may have important implications for analytic cell selection and for prognosis in ER-positive carcinomas. We studied 84 tissue blocks for level-to-level and geographic heterogeneity within level of the ER and cytokeratin by staining alternate serial sections for ER and cytokeratin. Distribution of ER and cytokeratin positivity was manually assessed. Homogenous positive staining was seen in 63 of 84 cases for ER and 71 of 84 cases for cytokeratin. Distinct geographic variability constant from level to level was seen in 7 cases for ER. In each of these cases, the cell populations stained uniformly for cytokeratin. Artifactual heterogeneity seemed to be uncommon for ER. Automated image analysis and manual ER estimation resulted in more positive cases than did the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) technique. Interobserver correlation for the manual method seemed high, as did correlation between the manual method and image analysis. Because a majority of the immunohistochemical staining heterogeneity for ER seemed to be biologic, we believe it may mark carcinomas that are less responsive to tamoxifen and more likely to progress than would be predicted by more traditional methods of ER analysis.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The increasingly popular immunohistochemical techniques for assay of the estrogen receptor (ER) allow localization of receptor positivity to specific cell populations. Heterogeneity of the ER in tumor cell populations may have important implications for analytic cell selection and for prognosis in ER-positive carcinomas. We studied 84 tissue blocks for level-to-level and geographic heterogeneity within level of the ER and cytokeratin by staining alternate serial sections for ER and cytokeratin. Distribution of ER and cytokeratin positivity was manually assessed. Homogenous positive staining was seen in 63 of 84 cases for ER and 71 of 84 cases for cytokeratin. Distinct geographic variability constant from level to level was seen in 7 cases for ER. In each of these cases, the cell populations stained uniformly for cytokeratin. Artifactual heterogeneity seemed to be uncommon for ER. Automated image analysis and manual ER estimation resulted in more positive cases than did the dextran-coated charcoal (DCC) technique. Interobserver correlation for the manual method seemed high, as did correlation between the manual method and image analysis. Because a majority of the immunohistochemical staining heterogeneity for ER seemed to be biologic, we believe it may mark carcinomas that are less responsive to tamoxifen and more likely to progress than would be predicted by more traditional methods of ER analysis.

Key concepts: Cytokeratin, Estrogen receptor, Immunohistochemistry, Pathology, Staining, Biology, Progesterone receptor, Estrogen

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Tissue Heterogeneity of Immunohistochemically Detected Estrogen Receptor: Implications for Image Analysis Quantification — Research Paper | ScholarLens