2003Unpublished venueRequires access

Comparative Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner formulations with Insecticides against Plutella xylostella (L.) and their Effect on Cotesia plutellae Kurdj. on Cauliflower

C. Gailce Leo Justin, Jacqueline Joshua, M. Jayasekhar

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner formulations against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) revealed that all the Bt. formulations except Spicturin were significantly superior in reducing the larval population. Dipel and Centari though less effective than Delfin were significantly better than all other insecticides. The highest yield was observed in Delfin-treated plots which was higher than the other treatments. All the insecticidal treatments exhibited a significant reduction in the number of Cotesia plutellaecocoons over control except the biopesticide Delfin in most of the observations over control. However, the pest: parasitoid ratio was maximum in Delfin-treatment followed by Dipel and Centari. Fenvalerate recorded the lowest ratio which was almost equal to the control and this was followed bv ouinalphos. Neem formulations recorded a relatively higher ratio than the chemical insecticides.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner formulations against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) revealed that all the Bt. formulations except Spicturin were significantly superior in reducing the larval population. Dipel and Centari though less effective than Delfin were significantly better than all other insecticides. The highest yield was observed in Delfin-treated plots which was higher than the other treatments. All the insecticidal treatments exhibited a significant reduction in the number of Cotesia plutellaecocoons over control except the biopesticide Delfin in most of the observations over control. However, the pest: parasitoid ratio was maximum in Delfin-treatment followed by Dipel and Centari. Fenvalerate recorded the lowest ratio which was almost equal to the control and this was followed bv ouinalphos. Neem formulations recorded a relatively higher ratio than the chemical insecticides.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Field evaluation of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner formulations against the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.) revealed that all the Bt. formulations except Spicturin were significantly superior in reducing the larval population. Dipel and Centari though less effective than Delfin were significantly better than all other insecticides. The highest yield was observed in Delfin-treated plots which was higher than the other treatments. All the insecticidal treatments exhibited a significant reduction in the number of Cotesia plutellaecocoons over control except the biopesticide Delfin in most of the observations over control. However, the pest: parasitoid ratio was maximum in Delfin-treatment followed by Dipel and Centari. Fenvalerate recorded the lowest ratio which was almost equal to the control and this was followed bv ouinalphos. Neem formulations recorded a relatively higher ratio than the chemical insecticides.

Key concepts: Plutella, Diamondback moth, Bacillus thuringiensis, Fenvalerate, Toxicology, Biology, Biopesticide, Population

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Efficacy of Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner formulations with Insecticides against Plutella xylostella (L.) and their Effect on Cotesia plutellae Kurdj. on Cauliflower — Research Paper | ScholarLens