2014BIOINFOLET - A Quarterly Journal of Life SciencesRequires access

Determination of LC50 value of deltamethrin2.8 EC, cypermethrin25 EC, endosulfan 35EC againsts Pilosoma oblique walker

Vimla Goswami, Usha Panihar

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The effects of three synthetic pyrethroids viz., deltamethrin, cypermethrin and endosulfaneach at three different concentrations against S. oblique was studied. Deltamethrin was found to be the most toxic insecticide. Based on LC50 values, the order of toxicity was: deltamethrin > cypermethrin > endosulfan.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The effects of three synthetic pyrethroids viz., deltamethrin, cypermethrin and endosulfaneach at three different concentrations against S. oblique was studied. Deltamethrin was found to be the most toxic insecticide. Based on LC50 values, the order of toxicity was: deltamethrin > cypermethrin > endosulfan.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The effects of three synthetic pyrethroids viz., deltamethrin, cypermethrin and endosulfaneach at three different concentrations against S. oblique was studied. Deltamethrin was found to be the most toxic insecticide. Based on LC50 values, the order of toxicity was: deltamethrin > cypermethrin > endosulfan.

Key concepts: Deltamethrin, Cypermethrin, Endosulfan, Toxicology, Biology, Pesticide, Agronomy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Determination of LC50 value of deltamethrin2.8 EC, cypermethrin25 EC, endosulfan 35EC againsts Pilosoma oblique walker — Research Paper | ScholarLens