1973Unpublished venueRequires access

Pol(yethylactylate) in dilute solutions

K. S. V. Srinivasan, M. Santappa

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA), solution polymerized in methyl ethyl ketone by free radical initiation, was fractionated and the fractions were characterized by light scattering, viscometry and osmometry. Fractions obtained were in the molecular weight range of 0.3 x 10 6 to 1.6 x 10 6 with a polydispersity of 1.40. The following Mark-Houwink relations were established: [η] 35°C acetone =4.15x10 -2 M 0-61 w [η] 35°C MEK =2.03x10 -2 M 0-66 w [η] 39.5°C n-propanal =7.87x10 -2 M 0-50 w It was found that n-propanol at 39.5°C was a theta solvent for poly(ethyl acrylate) and that acetone was a poor solvent compared to methyl ethyl ketone. A relation between the molecular dimension and the molecular weight was established. It was observed that the chain dimensions of poly(ethyl acrylate) and poly(butyl acrylate) were considerably larger than poly(ethyl methacrylate) and poly(butyl methacrylate) respectively. The validity of various extrapolation procedures that have been proposed for calculating the unperturbed dimensions have been examined. The steric factor for PEA was 2.16 compared to 2.10 for poly(ethyl methacrylate). Root mean square end-to-end distances were calculated from the Debye-Bueche and Kirkwood-Riseman methods and compared with the experimental values.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA), solution polymerized in methyl ethyl ketone by free radical initiation, was fractionated and the fractions were characterized by light scattering, viscometry and osmometry. Fractions obtained were in the molecular weight range of 0.3 x 10 6 to 1.6 x 10 6 with a polydispersity of 1.40. The following Mark-Houwink relations were established: [η] 35°C acetone =4.15x10 -2 M 0-61 w [η] 35°C MEK =2.03x10 -2 M 0-66 w [η] 39.5°C n-propanal =7.87x10 -2 M 0-50 w It was found that n-propanol at 39.5°C was a theta solvent for poly(ethyl acrylate) and that acetone was a poor solvent compared to methyl ethyl ketone. A relation between the molecular dimension and the molecular weight was established. It was observed that the chain dimensions of poly(ethyl acrylate) and poly(butyl acrylate) were considerably larger than poly(ethyl methacrylate) and poly(butyl methacrylate) respectively. The validity of various extrapolation procedures that have been proposed for calculating the unperturbed dimensions have been examined. The steric factor for PEA was 2.16 compared to 2.10 for poly(ethyl methacrylate). Root mean square end-to-end distances were calculated from the Debye-Bueche and Kirkwood-Riseman methods and compared with the experimental values.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Poly(ethyl acrylate) (PEA), solution polymerized in methyl ethyl ketone by free radical initiation, was fractionated and the fractions were characterized by light scattering, viscometry and osmometry. Fractions obtained were in the molecular weight range of 0.3 x 10 6 to 1.6 x 10 6 with a polydispersity of 1.40. The following Mark-Houwink relations were established: [η] 35°C acetone =4.15x10 -2 M 0-61 w [η] 35°C MEK =2.03x10 -2 M 0-66 w [η] 39.5°C n-propanal =7.87x10 -2 M 0-50 w It was found that n-propanol at 39.5°C was a theta solvent for poly(ethyl acrylate) and that acetone was a poor solvent compared to methyl ethyl ketone. A relation between the molecular dimension and the molecular weight was established. It was observed that the chain dimensions of poly(ethyl acrylate) and poly(butyl acrylate) were considerably larger than poly(ethyl methacrylate) and poly(butyl methacrylate) respectively. The validity of various extrapolation procedures that have been proposed for calculating the unperturbed dimensions have been examined. The steric factor for PEA was 2.16 compared to 2.10 for poly(ethyl methacrylate). Root mean square end-to-end distances were calculated from the Debye-Bueche and Kirkwood-Riseman methods and compared with the experimental values.

Key concepts: Ethyl acrylate, Methacrylate, Polymer chemistry, Steric factor, Osmometer, Dispersity, Methyl methacrylate, Acetone

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Pol(yethylactylate) in dilute solutions — Research Paper | ScholarLens