1991•Unpublished venueRequires access

Who's Making What Decisions: Monitoring Authority Shifts in Chicago School Reform.

GLENN HESS, John Q. Easton

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

As a result of the 1988 Chicago School Reform Act, a number of powers previously exercised at the central administration or board level have devolved upon the Local School Councils (LSCs) and principals. The cooperation of 14 representative schools was enlisted for an ongoing qualitative study of the dynamics of reform at the local level. To date, three reports have resulted from the study and these form the primary basis for this paper, in which LSC operations, principals' views of their changing roles, and an analysis of school improvement plans created by the sample schools are described. Attendance rates at LSC meetings varied greatly from council to council, and member participation seemed to depend on the topics being discussed. Principals saw their roles change in a primarily negative manner because of increased demands on their time and because some councils infringed upon powers legally mandated to principals. Positive comments from principals referred to increased discretion and flexibility as a result of school reform. On the average, LSCs discussed six topics per meeting and, in most cases, made decisions by votes that were the culmination of preceding discussion. Each of the 14 schools under observation adopted a school improvement plan during the spring of 1990, and virtually all the reform initiatives included within the plans were supported by current research on school improvement. Tables and graphs are included. (23 references) (EJS) *t********************************************************************* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** WHO'S MAKING WHAT DECISIONS: Monitoring Authority Shifts in Chicago School Reform1 G. Alfred Hess, Jr. and John Q. Easton2 CHIC4G0 PANEL ON PUBLIC SCHOOL POLICY AND FINANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION Office o/ Educalonal Research and impvovement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Thq document has been reproduced as received Ikon the person Of organizahon originating it 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Pointe of vqw or 00(nions staled in this docu menl do nol nec.Issanly represent official OERI position or policy PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).

About this research paper

What this paper is about

As a result of the 1988 Chicago School Reform Act, a number of powers previously exercised at the central administration or board level have devolved upon the Local School Councils (LSCs) and principals. The cooperation of 14 representative schools was enlisted for an ongoing qualitative study of the dynamics of reform at the local level. To date, three reports have resulted from the study and these form the primary basis for this paper, in which LSC operations, principals' views of their changing roles, and an analysis of school improvement plans created by the sample schools are described. Attendance rates at LSC meetings varied greatly from council to council, and member participation seemed to depend on the topics being discussed. Principals saw their roles change in a primarily negative manner because of increased demands on their time and because some councils infringed upon powers legally mandated to principals. Positive comments from principals referred to increased discretion and flexibility as a result of school reform. On the average, LSCs discussed six topics per meeting and, in most cases, made decisions by votes that were the culmination of preceding discussion. Each of the 14 schools under observation adopted a school improvement plan during the spring of 1990, and virtually all the reform initiatives included within the plans were supported by current research on school improvement. Tables and graphs are included. (23 references) (EJS) *t********************************************************************* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** WHO'S MAKING WHAT DECISIONS: Monitoring Authority Shifts in Chicago School Reform1 G. Alfred Hess, Jr. and John Q. Easton2 CHIC4G0 PANEL ON PUBLIC SCHOOL POLICY AND FINANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION Office o/ Educalonal Research and impvovement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Thq document has been reproduced as received Ikon the person Of organizahon originating it 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Pointe of vqw or 00(nions staled in this docu menl do nol nec.Issanly represent official OERI position or policy PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

As a result of the 1988 Chicago School Reform Act, a number of powers previously exercised at the central administration or board level have devolved upon the Local School Councils (LSCs) and principals. The cooperation of 14 representative schools was enlisted for an ongoing qualitative study of the dynamics of reform at the local level. To date, three reports have resulted from the study and these form the primary basis for this paper, in which LSC operations, principals' views of their changing roles, and an analysis of school improvement plans created by the sample schools are described. Attendance rates at LSC meetings varied greatly from council to council, and member participation seemed to depend on the topics being discussed. Principals saw their roles change in a primarily negative manner because of increased demands on their time and because some councils infringed upon powers legally mandated to principals. Positive comments from principals referred to increased discretion and flexibility as a result of school reform. On the average, LSCs discussed six topics per meeting and, in most cases, made decisions by votes that were the culmination of preceding discussion. Each of the 14 schools under observation adopted a school improvement plan during the spring of 1990, and virtually all the reform initiatives included within the plans were supported by current research on school improvement. Tables and graphs are included. (23 references) (EJS) *t********************************************************************* Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** WHO'S MAKING WHAT DECISIONS: Monitoring Authority Shifts in Chicago School Reform1 G. Alfred Hess, Jr. and John Q. Easton2 CHIC4G0 PANEL ON PUBLIC SCHOOL POLICY AND FINANCE U.S. DEPARTMENT Of EDUCATION Office o/ Educalonal Research and impvovement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Thq document has been reproduced as received Ikon the person Of organizahon originating it 0 Minor changes have been made to improve reproduction quality Pointe of vqw or 00(nions staled in this docu menl do nol nec.Issanly represent official OERI position or policy PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).

Key concepts: Discretion, Attendance, Political science, Public administration, Flexibility (engineering), Centralisation, Public relations, Sociology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Who's Making What Decisions: Monitoring Authority Shifts in Chicago School Reform. — Research Paper | ScholarLens