2014Journal of Educational Leadership Policy and PracticeRequires access

Challenging New Zealand mentor practice

Sarah Patterson, Kate Thornton

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

New guidelines for the induction and mentoring of beginning teachers were introduced by the New Zealand Teachers Council in 2011, however, there appears to be little evidence of their implementation in schools. Provision of mentor teacher professional development is recommended both in the guidelines and in international literature. A case study of the implementation of the guidelines in an intermediate school context identified a lack of preparation and support for mentors and revealed that beginning teachers, mentors and the principal had different perceptions of the purpose of the mentoring process. These findings, and lessons learnt from exemplary mentoring programmes such as those provided by the New Teacher Center, highlight recommendations including the need for: clear expectations and procedures; selection criteria; professional development for mentors; and leadership of the mentoring process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

New guidelines for the induction and mentoring of beginning teachers were introduced by the New Zealand Teachers Council in 2011, however, there appears to be little evidence of their implementation in schools. Provision of mentor teacher professional development is recommended both in the guidelines and in international literature. A case study of the implementation of the guidelines in an intermediate school context identified a lack of preparation and support for mentors and revealed that beginning teachers, mentors and the principal had different perceptions of the purpose of the mentoring process. These findings, and lessons learnt from exemplary mentoring programmes such as those provided by the New Teacher Center, highlight recommendations including the need for: clear expectations and procedures; selection criteria; professional development for mentors; and leadership of the mentoring process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

New guidelines for the induction and mentoring of beginning teachers were introduced by the New Zealand Teachers Council in 2011, however, there appears to be little evidence of their implementation in schools. Provision of mentor teacher professional development is recommended both in the guidelines and in international literature. A case study of the implementation of the guidelines in an intermediate school context identified a lack of preparation and support for mentors and revealed that beginning teachers, mentors and the principal had different perceptions of the purpose of the mentoring process. These findings, and lessons learnt from exemplary mentoring programmes such as those provided by the New Teacher Center, highlight recommendations including the need for: clear expectations and procedures; selection criteria; professional development for mentors; and leadership of the mentoring process.

Key concepts: Context (archaeology), Professional development, Principal (computer security), Process (computing), Faculty development, Medical education, Perception, Psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Challenging New Zealand mentor practice — Research Paper | ScholarLens