2014SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

Wrongful Death Actions Under Section 1983: A Roundtable Dialogue

Martin A. Schwartz, Steven H. Steinglass, R.D. Emery, Ilann Margalit Maazel, Erwin Chemerinsky, Victor Marrero

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

At the time this Article was published, wrongful death actions that were asserted under § 1983 had proven to be very complex matters. Between and among the lower federal courts, there was disagreement on how to resolve these cases. In this Article, an esteemed panel worthy of addressing such a difficult topic discusses and analyzes such cases. The authors begin by examining how courts handle questions of survivorship of claims, and the importance of keeping the survivorship and wrongful death issues separate. They also address cases in which the argument is raised about a deficiency in the federal law, why such deficiencies are not always obvious, and whether it is still necessary to determine whether the state statutes turned to in instances of federal law deficiencies are consistent with § 1983 policies. Lastly, the authors explore different state rulings in response to recovery of damages for the surviving plaintiff and supplemental state law wrongful death claims.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

At the time this Article was published, wrongful death actions that were asserted under § 1983 had proven to be very complex matters. Between and among the lower federal courts, there was disagreement on how to resolve these cases. In this Article, an esteemed panel worthy of addressing such a difficult topic discusses and analyzes such cases. The authors begin by examining how courts handle questions of survivorship of claims, and the importance of keeping the survivorship and wrongful death issues separate. They also address cases in which the argument is raised about a deficiency in the federal law, why such deficiencies are not always obvious, and whether it is still necessary to determine whether the state statutes turned to in instances of federal law deficiencies are consistent with § 1983 policies. Lastly, the authors explore different state rulings in response to recovery of damages for the surviving plaintiff and supplemental state law wrongful death claims.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

At the time this Article was published, wrongful death actions that were asserted under § 1983 had proven to be very complex matters. Between and among the lower federal courts, there was disagreement on how to resolve these cases. In this Article, an esteemed panel worthy of addressing such a difficult topic discusses and analyzes such cases. The authors begin by examining how courts handle questions of survivorship of claims, and the importance of keeping the survivorship and wrongful death issues separate. They also address cases in which the argument is raised about a deficiency in the federal law, why such deficiencies are not always obvious, and whether it is still necessary to determine whether the state statutes turned to in instances of federal law deficiencies are consistent with § 1983 policies. Lastly, the authors explore different state rulings in response to recovery of damages for the surviving plaintiff and supplemental state law wrongful death claims.

Key concepts: Wrongful death, Plaintiff, Damages, Law, Statute, State (computer science), Political science, Argument (complex analysis)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Wrongful Death Actions Under Section 1983: A Roundtable Dialogue — Research Paper | ScholarLens