2010SSRN Electronic JournalOpen access

The Chinese Military as Modernization Agent? Continuing the Debate on the Role of Military in Non-Military Missions

Lee Dongmin

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

How do we explain why some countries have gone farther than others in their utilization of armed forces in non-military missions? After all, are the military as agent of modernization still relevant today? Mainstream theoretical approaches in comparative politics have difficulty responding to these questions. Whether they theorize justification for military's extended role in non-military missions, skeptical to such enquires, these approaches tend to underestimate either danger of military massive involvement in society, or benefit of borrowing manpower of standing army during the peacetime. This article examines China's utilization of its armed forces for non-military missions while maintaining civilian supremacy and military professionalism. This article suggests that the PLA were able to play the role of modernization agent with shared beliefs that served as integrating glue holding the military and party together.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

How do we explain why some countries have gone farther than others in their utilization of armed forces in non-military missions? After all, are the military as agent of modernization still relevant today? Mainstream theoretical approaches in comparative politics have difficulty responding to these questions. Whether they theorize justification for military's extended role in non-military missions, skeptical to such enquires, these approaches tend to underestimate either danger of military massive involvement in society, or benefit of borrowing manpower of standing army during the peacetime. This article examines China's utilization of its armed forces for non-military missions while maintaining civilian supremacy and military professionalism. This article suggests that the PLA were able to play the role of modernization agent with shared beliefs that served as integrating glue holding the military and party together.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

How do we explain why some countries have gone farther than others in their utilization of armed forces in non-military missions? After all, are the military as agent of modernization still relevant today? Mainstream theoretical approaches in comparative politics have difficulty responding to these questions. Whether they theorize justification for military's extended role in non-military missions, skeptical to such enquires, these approaches tend to underestimate either danger of military massive involvement in society, or benefit of borrowing manpower of standing army during the peacetime. This article examines China's utilization of its armed forces for non-military missions while maintaining civilian supremacy and military professionalism. This article suggests that the PLA were able to play the role of modernization agent with shared beliefs that served as integrating glue holding the military and party together.

Key concepts: Peacetime, Modernization theory, Revolution in Military Affairs, Military theory, Military science, Military threat, Military sociology, China

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Chinese Military as Modernization Agent? Continuing the Debate on the Role of Military in Non-Military Missions — Research Paper | ScholarLens