2002Journal of researchRequires access

Evaluation of Modified Climatological Approaches for the Estimation of Evapotranspiration

Kamal Gurmit Singh, Pawanpreet Kaur

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Four modified empirical methods viz. Blaney Criddle method, Radiation method, Modified Penman method and Pan evaporation methods of determining potential evapotranspiration were compared for Ludhiana conditions. The potential evapotranspiration values calculated by these methods were multiplied by crop coefficient to find the actual evapotranspiration and these actual ET values were compared with lysimeter data. The study suggested that Modified Penman method is best for cumulative evapotranspiration (CET) and radiation method is best for calculating the daily/fortnightly evapotranspiration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Four modified empirical methods viz. Blaney Criddle method, Radiation method, Modified Penman method and Pan evaporation methods of determining potential evapotranspiration were compared for Ludhiana conditions. The potential evapotranspiration values calculated by these methods were multiplied by crop coefficient to find the actual evapotranspiration and these actual ET values were compared with lysimeter data. The study suggested that Modified Penman method is best for cumulative evapotranspiration (CET) and radiation method is best for calculating the daily/fortnightly evapotranspiration.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Four modified empirical methods viz. Blaney Criddle method, Radiation method, Modified Penman method and Pan evaporation methods of determining potential evapotranspiration were compared for Ludhiana conditions. The potential evapotranspiration values calculated by these methods were multiplied by crop coefficient to find the actual evapotranspiration and these actual ET values were compared with lysimeter data. The study suggested that Modified Penman method is best for cumulative evapotranspiration (CET) and radiation method is best for calculating the daily/fortnightly evapotranspiration.

Key concepts: Evapotranspiration, Lysimeter, Pan evaporation, Crop coefficient, Mathematics, Penman–Monteith equation, Evaporation, Hydrology (agriculture)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Evaluation of Modified Climatological Approaches for the Estimation of Evapotranspiration — Research Paper | ScholarLens